On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Florent Gilain wrote:
> Hummm thanks a lot, it was finally easyer than i was thinking ;-))
>
> Florent
>
[...]
> 70_zmi_german.cf:scoreZMIde_SUBBIG 1.8
>
> so the file containing the rule is 70_zmi_german.cf in the current
> directory.
you are welcome :)
regards,
Matthi
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Jason Little wrote:
>
> I was wondering about the maturity of the botnet plugin and where I can get
> my hands on it again. I used an early version of it for a while but I
> removed it because we didn't really need it and now it seems I need it again
> with all the spammers f
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Florent Gilain wrote:
hI,
> Hello all,
>
> When i run this :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]# spamassassin --lint
> [21570] warn: config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
> MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART
> [21570] warn: config: warning: description exists for non-ex
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, pocopelli wrote:
hI,
> Hello everybody,
>
> we have an extern rootserver with our provider in Germany.
> MTA=Qmail
> Config Webinterface = PLESK 8.0
> We have a number of domains hosted on it with emailAccounts.
> The mails of the different domains are in subdirecties similar
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, David Reta wrote:
hI,
> I am looking for some help with an issue I am having. Some spam has been
> getting through and it looks like when it comes through a bunch of rules
> are not getting hit, but when I run it manually as the same user that my
> mimedefang runs as it score
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> Test SARE rules (sare_stock, sare_spoof especially) and fred's rules
> from www.rulesemporium.com are very useful..
>
> Also make sure you're running SA 3.1.7 with the latest "sa-update"-ed
> core rules..
[...]
> > Recently (for the last two w
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Thomas Cameron wrote:
hI,
> All -
>
> I'm using Sendmail on RHEL 4 with SA and spamass-milter, clamav-milter
> and milter-greylist. What is the best way for SpamAssassin to use DCC?
>
> So far I've created an RPM with these configure options:
>
> ./configure \
> --homedir=
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, jdow wrote:
> Were the servers down for about 6 hours today for some reason? I noticed
> some emails I sent were delayed something like 6 hours on delivery. I'm
> not complaining. I'm just curious. (Apache received it and it stayed
> parked there until they sent it on out.)
la
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, hansje2000 wrote:
>
> I realy tryed evrything on her, but still thate permission errors.
>
> i reinstal it for 5 times now..
> read about 100 pages of spammassassin but nothing specialy about settingup
> for ussers to find just little pieces.. and did not reale help me out ther
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, #Ronan McGlue wrote:
Hello,
> Managers like graphs. I have created my own graphs for our universites system
> which is running exim and SA 3.1.3. More details will follow if there is
> interest.
> the url is here
>
> http://mailstats.qub.ac.uk
>
> how does this compare to what
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
[...]
> > > > with this file.
> > > >
> > > > fix the file ownership and you should be able to resolve your problem.
> > > >
> > > > Alan
> > > >
> > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
> > > > Comment: Using GnuPG wit
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
hI,
[...]
> > > I have the below permissions and i also tested it running as normal
> > > user, I get
> > >
> > > [28976] error: auto-whitelist: cannot open auto_whitelist_path
> > > /var/lib/spamass/auto-whitelist: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> > > [
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>
[...]
>
> are some of your partitions mounted via nfs? if so, try using in your
> local.cf:
> lock_method nfssafe
>
> this should the default value if you didnt set "lock_method flock" which
> is not nfs safe.
> i can reproduces the message, when i a
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, hansje2000 wrote:
Hi,
>
> Thaks for reply Matthias,
np :)
> First of all there is no spamd in /etc/rc2.d/, just a S80spamassassin, but i
> gues its the same.
> There is also a S80sendmail in /etc/rc2.d/ like you said.
yes, names can differ.
> The bothe files are also in ?e
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
> > > > /home/kaushal/spamass/auto-whitelist: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> > > > [20405] warn: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed:
> > > > auto-whitelist: cannot open auto_whitelist_path
> >
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> On 7/5/06, Matthias Fuhrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> >
> > hello,
> >
> > > I ran spamd as normal user and it gave me the below error
> > &g
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
hello,
> I ran spamd as normal user and it gave me the below error
>
>
> [20405] error: auto-whitelist: cannot open auto_whitelist_path
> /home/kaushal/spamass/auto-whitelist: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> [20405] warn: auto-whitelist: open of auto-wh
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Geoff Soper wrote:
Hi,
> I'm getting the following three warning in my procmail log (machine name
> removed, just in case!), I assume I'm missing some configuration somewhere but
> don't know where! Can someone advise?
>
> Thanks,
> Geoff
>
> [8162] warn: config: cannot write
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, hansje2000 wrote:
hEllo,
> Im new on spamassassin, but learning.
> I have a little error on startup
> sendmail: WARNING: Xspamassassin: local socket name /var/run/spamass.sock
> missing
> But the file is there?!
>
> It look likes sendmail is starting up first before the sock
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, LDB wrote:
> Right now, I have a promailrc script,
>
> LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log
> LOGABSTRACT=all
> VERBOSE=yes
>
> SENDER=$1
> SHIFT=1
>
> # Until now, mail is untagged, you may add rules for
> # mail that must not be tagged
>
> :0 hbfw
> | /usr/bin/spamc
>
> # Now mail i
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Jose perez wrote:
> I run /usr/local/bin/spamd -u spam and i get this error:
>
> [143440] error: setruid() not implemented at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 877.
> setruid() not implemented at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 877.
> [86114] info: spamd: server successfully spawned child p
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Andrea Bencini wrote:
> I install
> postfix-2.2.2
> amavisd-new-2.3.3
> spamassassin-3.0.4
>
> I am testing spamassassin with spam-test
> XJS*C4JDBQADN1.NSBN3*ANDARD-ANTI-UBE-TEST-EMAIL*C.34X
> and I receive
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=998.359 tagged_above=2 required
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Claude Frantz wrote:
hI,
> In my /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre, there is a line:
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
>
> There is also a file:
>
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DCC.pm
>
> but DCC is not active. What is missing here ?
>
>
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Bradley Walker wrote:
hI,
> What Perl modules does SA require? I'm looking into this as being a
> possible cause of my 421 SMTP timeout errors.
have a look here:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/dist/INSTALL
regards,
Matthias
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, czar wrote:
hI,
[...]
> # I try the CPAN test install of Mail::SpamAssassin, this MIGHT be the
> problem?
> $ perl -MCPAN -e shell
> $ test Mail::SpamAssassin
> [...]
> t ../masses/parse-rules-for-masses line 86, line 55.
> Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuat
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Dave Augustus wrote:
>
> Anyone point me in the right direction?
>
> I am just thinking of increasing the spam level counter based on whether
> they have a reverse IP address. I have tried to reject these outiright
> based on this criteria but that would cause too many false p
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Eric W. Bates wrote:
> Sorry to rehash what must be an old question...
>
> I can't find LMAP/CID2SPF on CPAN or FreeBSD ports. I found an old list
> item suggesting that there was a download link at:
> http://www.openspf.org/downloads.html
> This link appears to be gone at the
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Shane Mullins wrote:
hI,
> I have forgotten the setting that tells SA to include the point value
> for each of the hits the incoming message was flagged on. I searched
> the web and looked in my book, but can't seem to find it. Could someone
> please jog my memory?
"add_he
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Scott Russell wrote:
hI,
> I've seen this under both SA 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 and I have IP::Country 2.20
> installed. If I enable debug mode in spamd I see
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry load. When processing a message
> through spamd I also see metadata: X-Relay-Count
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 07:45:47PM +0100, Cedric Foll wrote:
> > So by default, spamassassin read /usr/share/spamassassin and next /var/lib.
> > And rules of /var/lib overwright the ones of /usr/share/spamassassin.
> >
> > I'm right ?
>
> Not really.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote:
hI,
> I wanted to know what's the meaning of the following numbers and how could
> I customize for example this rule scores...
>
> # DCC
> ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
> score DCC_CHECK 0 1.37 0 2.17
> endif # Mail::SpamAssassin::P
Hello,
just updated to 3.1.1. while it seems working well, it's introducing a new
error message to my syslog:
Mar 12 21:32:27 machine spamd[6027]: plugin: eval failed: Can't use
string ("Net::DNS::RR::MX") as a HASH ref while "strict refs" in use at
/opt/gnu/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/sun4-solari
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Damian Saez Baldo wrote:
> Hello list:
> I'm using SpamAssasin 3.1.0 in a Windows server. I'm using
> spamassasin as follows
>
> c:\perl\bin\perl.exe -S -T c:\Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0\spamassassin -P -c
> c:\Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0\rules\ < C:\TEMP\Mail_TESTME.TXT >
> c:
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Xueron Nee wrote:
> Hi, all:
>
> I am using sa-learn to train my bayes filter. And I collect many
> known spams from our honey pot.
>
> I found that there are so many mails with the same content in
> this spam corpus. Is it necessary to delete the repeated spams bef
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Chris Purves wrote:
hI,
> I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
> SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
>
> [5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
> [5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, cannot use
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> martin f krafft writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we have a bunch of users who use our SASL-enabled SMTP server to
> > relay their mail when on the road. This causes the following
> > Received header:
> >
> > Received: from septumania (217-162-227-XXX.dclient.h
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Steve Thomas wrote:
> > i googled a bit and found this related to fedora3 and SELinux:
> > http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?11,20759,21482#msg-21482
>
> I had seen that page, but didn't know what selinux was (thought it was a
> distro!) so I thought it was irrelevant. After ch
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Steve Thomas wrote:
> >> Feb 22 11:45:42 ronin spamd[3322]: bayes: unable to connect to database:
> >> Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket
> >> '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (13)
> >
> > Is that where mysql.sock is located? I don't know where the MySQL RPMs
> > mi
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Muenz, Michael wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I've created some really simple HAM rules for my setup.
> Just give from belgium to a specific domain -1 points.
> spamassassin --lint doensn't give me any errors back, but
> amavisd-new doesn't list the rule.
>
>
> Log:
>
> SPAM, <[EMAIL
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Marc Perkel wrote:
hI,
> I see DCC and PYZOR template tags, are there RAZOR template tags?
you are missing check symbols of razor, like RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100?
look in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre if you uncomment this line:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Raz
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
> - Original Message -
> >> I'm not sure it'll be a parameter as only about 7,000
> >> messages failed out of 90,000. Unless its some kind of
> >> time out... But thats the thing, I don't know what the
> >> error 70 means.
> >
> >look for a file c
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I've been running the latest spamd for months now, and it seems to be a
> weekly (at least) occurence that all my child processes will fill up and
> hang the thing and allow spam to start seeping through.
>
> However, today I wok
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
> - Original Message -
> >> Has anyone got any idea's on this? No one responded to my
> >> first post on it.
> >> ---
> >> I'm using a script to pipe messages to spamc. Out of
> >> about 90,000 messages passed to spamc via the script
> >> about 7,
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jeremy Kister wrote:
> A few weeks ago i deleted my bayes_seen and bayes_toks files because
> bayes was behaving poorly.
>
> I have been working hard to retrain bayes, and have realized a problem:
> using sa-learn --dump magic, nham is stuck at 182.
>
> I can learn a use sa-lea
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Duncan Hill wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 21:58, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
>
> > just a question about the purpose of Long.pm. Am I right asuming, it
> > just tries to get local machines hostname and domainname. nothing else
> > additionaly. Co
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Duncan Hill wrote:
> On Sunday 29 January 2006 21:19, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > recently i see many of those lines in our syslog:
> > >
> > > Jan 2
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Joe Zitnik wrote:
> For the last few days, I've been receiving stock spam, same format as
> the other stock spam, except the spam is a gif image. Some
> randomstringofletters.gif, and a bunch of text. The random text will
> show up at the bottom of the page. The ones I'm cu
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Duncan Hill wrote:
> On Sunday 29 January 2006 21:19, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > recently i see many of those lines in our syslog:
> > >
> > > Jan 2
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> recently i see many of those lines in our syslog:
>
> Jan 29 21:56:06 machine spamd[1951]: Insecure dependency in `` while
> running with -T switch at /opt/gnu/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Sy
> s/Hostname/L
Hello,
recently i see many of those lines in our syslog:
Jan 29 21:56:06 machine spamd[1951]: Insecure dependency in `` while
running with -T switch at /opt/gnu/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Sy
s/Hostname/Long.pm line 91, line 90.
running 3.0.4 / perl 5.8.3 on sparc sun solaris 5.9. latest version
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, mouss wrote:
> Matthias Fuhrmann a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > we have some lists on a server maintained by mailman. since mails for
> > moderators contains offten spammy content, those mails are rated as spam
> > too. i tr
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, David B Funk wrote:
Hello,
[..]
> Many mechanisms for calling SA do -not- make the envelope-from address
> available for rule matching (including miltrassassin), thus the failure of
> your whitelist_from_rcvd.
our version currently runnign is: (using Revision: 1.15 Date: 200
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Mike Jackson wrote:
> > we have some lists on a server maintained by mailman. since mails for
> > moderators contains offten spammy content, those mails are rated as spam
> > too. i tried whitelisting with for example:
> >
> > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain
> > w
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Vincenzo Martiello wrote:
> Do you use this parameter in MaiScanner.conf ?
> "Ignore Spam Whitelist If Recipients Exceed = "
>
[...]
> > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain
> > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1
> >
> > and some more, but all failed.
> >
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Daniel J. Cody wrote:
> Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
> > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain
> > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain
> > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain
> > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1
Hello,
we have some lists on a server maintained by mailman. since mails for
moderators contains offten spammy content, those mails are rated as spam
too. i tried whitelisting with for example:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain
whitelist_fr
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, wrote:
hI,
> All,
>
> I'm confused as to how to block words with spaces.
> For example,
> V ia G ra
> M o r t g a g e
> Etc...
are you using SARE rules already? if not, have a look at:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm. 70_sare_obfu.cf might be usefull
in that case
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Anton Krall wrote:
> Guys.
>
> Is it just me or has spam increased for the past few days? Its like amavis
> and SA are not caching a lot anymore...
>
> Any ideas?
does it mean, there are no tags set in the header of emails, or just low
scorings?
no tags means, there were time
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Jose Hidalgo wrote:
>
> > OS: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p12
> >
> > p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4
> > p5-Net-DNS-0.51
> > razor-agents-2.72
> > perl-5.8.7
> >
> > When trying
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Jose Hidalgo wrote:
> OS: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p12
>
> p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4
> p5-Net-DNS-0.51
> razor-agents-2.72
> perl-5.8.7
>
> When trying to report a message it fails with the following error:
>
> razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Died at
> /usr/local/l
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Dickenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 6:18 PM
> To: Jean-Paul Natola
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Blacklisting
>
> On Jul 13, 2005, at 11:55 AM, Jean-Pa
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
[...]
> # jm: do not...
>
> the lines from Bayes.pm fits to the error messages. didnt checked
> PerMsgStatus.pm, but i guess its the same issue.
> can someone explain the difference or the impact to the problem, described
> abo
Hello,
nearly a year ago, i had trouble upgrading to 2.64. the problem ist still
present.
running 2.64 leads to mass syslog filling due to this lines:
Jul 10 22:41:35 xx spamd[15244]: Use of uninitialized value in
concatenation (.) or string at /opt/gnu/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/S
pamAs
63 matches
Mail list logo
