I have only recently begun using SA 2.63, because that's what my host made
available through automatic install.
With the help of this group and such as SARE and other available rulesets,
I am catching a load of spam. No Bayes, just the packaged rulesets and the
local.cf. I am enjoying learning
My local.cf is like so:
# Enable the Bayes system
use_bayes 1
# Enable Bayes auto-learning
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_path/home/spamd/
bayes_file_mode 0666
using sa-learn --spam etc., Bayes analyzed 270 messages.
I restarted spamd.
Am I mistaken that testing o
At 09:45 PM 6/23/2005, jdow wrote:
It is not SpamAssassin that sends things to your spam mail box. It is
your milter, procmail, or other similar tool which reads the headers
SpamAssassin adds and sorts the mail into your spam mailbox. You
apparently destroyed the piece of header format that was
Following an example I saw elsewhere, I thought I would get cute and
customize my headers:
clear_headers
add_header all Flag _YESNOCAPS_
add_header spam Level _STARS(*)_
fold_headers 1
add_header all Summary Score _HITS_ (Spam threshold is _REQD_);
Tests: _TESTSSCORES(, )_
Looks great, just w
Does anyone have a ruleset for catching any or all of these stock tips?
Matt
At 08:10 AM 6/23/2005, you wrote:
I cut-n-pasted your rule into my local.cf and sure enough it got a 1.0
score. That is the default score assigned to a rule with no declared
score. So I scrutinized your rule and discovered that you capitalized the
K in the "score" line but not in the "meta" l
New user. FreeBSD, SA 2.6.3.
I am trying to create a meta rule which will assign a negative value
if a password appears in either the Subject or Body.
Following an example by Matt Kettler in his SA-rules-howto.txt, I
came up with the following:
header __VV_PassKeyH Subject =~ /VV/i
b
