Procmail or some other delivery agent?
Regards,
Martyn
--
Martyn Drake
http://www.drake.org.uk
http://www.ourlittleduckling.com
be already
have an updated list? There is one Korean IP that's bothering me
incredibly these days with hundreds of thousands of ssh-connections:
220.65.232.100
But I didn't find it on your list although it's Korean. So maybe I just
misunderstood you.
Thanks in advance,
Andy
e system running RDJ from cron.
Regards,
Martyn
--
Martyn Drake
http://www.drake.org.uk
http://www.ourlittleduckling.com
Just post something (anything!) to Usenet and watch the amount of spam
come flooding in (eventually).
Regards,
Martyn
--
Martyn Drake
http://www.drake.org.uk
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1279160/
Steven Dickenson wrote:
You might be able to get your security group to take responsibility for
it. Many enterprises now consider first-line email servers something of
an application-level proxy, particularly first-line servers that handle
spam and malware filtering. In these cases, they're
Lima Union wrote:
Any idea how many 'commercial solutions' depend on SA ?
The Barracuda does IIRC and doesn't MessageLabs also use SA (amongst
other things)?
Regards,
Martyn
JamesDR wrote:
As far as ease of setup? When I first started with SA I was more of the
doze admin than the Linux admin.
I've been doing Linux stuff since around 1996/1997 and have my own
dedicated server that I get to ruin^H^H^H^play with before rolling it
across work-related matters. I'd
. MessageLabs was outrageously
expensive, and we didn't particularly want to have mail going through
third-party servers.
In the end it was far better to do it myself with SpamAssassin, RDJ,
limited RBL and a few other tweaks, and that's how it's been so far.
Regards,
Ma
Owen McShane wrote on 07 December 2004 11:04:
> That Status: Locked doesn't look too good.
I always thought that was the register lock so that nobody can make changes
to the domain name (i.e. change nameservers) until the domain has been
unlocked. It's an anti-abuse system. Normally you would h
jdow wrote on 07 December 2004 10:59:
> Fascinating - "whois" doesn't even report a vistage of the name.
> {^_^}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# whois rulesemporium.com
[Querying whois.internic.net]
[Redirected to whois.enom.com]
[Querying whois.enom.com]
[whois.enom.com]
Registration Service Provided B
Martin Hepworth wrote on 07 December 2004 10:49:
> Did you forget to re-register the domain
It's registered until October 2005 (according to the WHOIS lookup), so I
would doubt that's the issue . The nameservers are not letting up
their secrets - it's returning a big fat nowt when querying t
Thanks to all - now up and running just fine :)
Regards,
Martyn
Martyn Drake wrote on 01 December 2004 18:57:
> Hi,
>
> What's happened to the RulesDuJour site? Unfortunately not able to
> access it as it seems to have disapeared off the face of the Earth!
>
&
Hi,
What's happened to the RulesDuJour site? Unfortunately not able to access
it as it seems to have disapeared off the face of the Earth!
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
redirects to beta.exit0.us and that doesn't exist as a host:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# host beta.exit0.us
H
Quick question on presenting messages to sa-learn for processing - is it
sufficient to forward message(s) as attachments to an mbox under
/var/spool/mail and running sa-learn --spam or sa-learn --ham on it?
If not, is there a better way for Outlook users (and those without bounce or
redirect optio
14 matches
Mail list logo
