Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> So long as the "problem relays" are acting solely as MSAs and never MXes
> for your mail this patch will solve your problem:
> http://people.apache.org/~dos/sa-patches/msa_networks.3.1
This patch will solve my problems on receiving such mails from other
users, and spare
Hello Wolfgang!
You forgot to cc your posting to the list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> common cases that SA recognizes declare auth in the received headers, i.e.
> per hop
> (received ... with ESMPTA)
> Whether X-Authenticated (or any other separate header) would be useful at all
> depe
an idication some check might have occurred.
Greetings,
Martin von Gagern
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jay Chandler wrote:
> Not entirely sure what you're saying in the last two paragraphs,
OK, let me put this in different words, let's be more concrete.
As you all can see I have this Mail Address @gmx.net. GMX is my mail
provider. They run a server mail.gmx.net for email submission, where I
have to
Jason Little wrote:
> Just fire it through your ISP's mail server. They should be able to relay
> for you without a problem.
>
> Jason
Why would things look any different if I use my ISP instead of my IMP
(Mail Provider)? I'll check this week, but I'm not conviced yet.
And how about those idea
sin setups out there.
Greetings,
Martin von Gagern
--- Begin Message ---
Waiting for SORBS hit.
--- End Message ---
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
