Re: Matching on X-Spam headers doesn't get a hit

2021-07-23 Thread Martin Flygenring
ex = ^X-Spam-Status:: YES   accept But I would expect that check going over the whole message (same a the full check in SA) and not so targeted as a postfix header rule Cheers tobi On 7/23/21 11:23 AM, Martin Flygenring wrote: We don't run Postfix here, but we can probably look for it elsewhere

Re: Matching on X-Spam headers doesn't get a hit

2021-07-23 Thread Martin Flygenring
2 Jul 2021 20:09:19 +0300 Henrik K wrote: On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:06:15PM +0300, Henrik K wrote: On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:15:54PM +0200, Martin Flygenring wrote: Is there a limitation to SpamAssassin so it doesn't accept looking for the two X-Spam-headers, or can you spot why this

Matching on X-Spam headers doesn't get a hit

2021-07-22 Thread Martin Flygenring
he two X-Spam-headers, or can you spot why this rule isn't matching? Currently i'm testing it on: SpamAssassin version 3.4.6   running on Perl version 5.32.1 on a machine running Manjaro. -- Martin Flygenring (maf) Systems Engineer, One.com