-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René Berber skrev:
>>
>>
>>> Is there somehow I can check that all the other files are in place;
>>> libgcc_s.so.1, ld.so.1 and mysql.so (well I know they are there, I
>>> checked, but whether the linking was done to the right files etc)?
>> Yes, `per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René Berber skrev:
>
>
> OK, try `spamassassin --lint -D` and look for a line similar to
> this one (near the top, around line 30 in my test):
>
> [2324] dbg: diag: perl platform: 5.008007
>
Ok, done that, and as I suspected:
dbg: diag: perl platform:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René Berber skrev:
> You are probably using two different perl versions, in one you have
DBD::mysql,
> in the other (perl 5.8.6) you don't.
>
Yes, there are two versions of perl installed but only 5.8.6 is used
(atleast in a SA perspective and CPAN/DB
ave anything to do with PATHs, or LD_PATHs for the spamd user?
Kind regards
Markus Eskola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFoOJla7TLhj30WOQRAsGiAJ9W52ptSjPaYksU6kB9o+8vWI8yTgCcCbD5
Cck8JiK0/G0F0IzCfzZDa/k=
=qkKh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marko Lerota wrote:
> Matthew Yette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Based on my settings (3.0.4), this is my line in the spamd.run
>> file:
>>
>> exec /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -q -m5 -H -u qscand 2>&1
>>
>> I'm also not getting any errors with that -d l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Yette wrote:
>
>
> On 9/22/05 9:39 AM, "Marko Lerota" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Markus Eskola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Skip the -d for daemonize makes damonto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marko Lerota wrote:
> Matthew Yette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I've looked on Google for a while now - I haven't been able to
>> find directions or references to having spamd monitored under
>> daemontools. Specifically where I would find how t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 14:06 Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
>
>> If, for example I had an IMAP folder into which I drop spam that
>> my mail server should report on my behalf -then reporting would
>> become far less of
