On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:48:55AM -0700, Steven Kurylo wrote:
>>
>> My question is - Does spamassassin scan the mail for each recipient? or
>> does it scan only once? If it is the later I would not expect
>> spamassassin to fall over each time one of these mailouts is sent.
>>
>> Is this due to i
Hi all,
debian testing
spamassassin 3.2.1
exim4-deamon-heavy 4.67
At present I have a huge amount of rule files loaded on to a system that
does not process alot of mail (including sa-blacklist). This works fine
the majority of the time but falls over as soon as someone at the office
sends a mailo
, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Mark Adams wrote:
> > Ok, Fair enough.. I will change this listing to a whitelist_from_rcvd
> > as I assume this list is farmed by spammers. (Should be using that
> > always of course!)
> >
> > Header below.
> >
> > Enve
spam is getting through).
Regards,
Mark
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:50:12AM +0100, Anthony Peacock wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Can you be more specific?
>
> Was someone/thing changing your whitelist file?
>
> Mark Adams wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I would like to note that
Hi All,
I would like to note that this problem has been corrected, and was due
to an external automatic updating source.
Thanks for all the help that has been provided.
Regards,
Mark
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:50:52PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
> I have changed my reporting template, and now
idea what could be going on here?
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:52:20PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
> Thanks, I did run exactly that, and got the output that I posted. Do you
> have any idea why I might be getting such a limited output?
>
> What do you have set for reporting purposes in your l
run -t with -D?
>
> Your Spam report is truncated so we can't see which rules are hit. When
> you run spamassassin in test mode you should see a fuller report of the
> rules that hit.
>
> Mark Adams wrote:
> >Ok, Fair enough.. I will change this listing to a whitel
"Lindsay,Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Tony White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Ivan Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Redirect-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Score: 40
X-Spam-Report: hits=4.0 required=5.0 test=NO_RDNS,VOWEL_FROM_7
This is a multi-par
ore often than not, the reason that whitelisting is not
> matching is that the headers you think are matching are not. Or there
> is a type in the whitelist.cf file.
>
> By not allowing us to see the entire header, you are making us guess.
>
> Mark Adams wrote:
> >
; I would think we need to see the FULL headers of this example email
> before anyone can comment.
>
> Mark Adams wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have changed my reporting so it provides more information, and run
> >--test-mode with a message marked as spam, that should b
/etc/spamassassin/whitelist.cf
But when running test mode I still do not get any reports on it being
hit by the whitelist.
Help!
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:51:43PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:40:27PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > Mark Adams wrote:
> > &
Thanks, I did run exactly that, and got the output that I posted. Do you
have any idea why I might be getting such a limited output?
What do you have set for reporting purposes in your local.cf file?
Regards,
Mark
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:31:16PM -0500, maillist wrote:
> Mark Adams wr
>
> You could run: "spamassassin --test-mode < message", and see what it is
> scoring.
>
Hi There,
I have tried this, and get the below result.
--_=_NextPart_001_01C7710E.58A560A4--
hits=4.0 required=5.0 test=NO_RDNS,VOWEL_FROM_7
This does not show whitelist hits, should it?
Regards,
Ma
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:40:27PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Mark Adams wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:06:51AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > > Is it scoring the whitelist lower or is it just not hitting?
> > >
> > > Can you post your whitelist
> > Whitelist file is in /etc/spamassassin/ and is called whitelist.cf
> > entry;
> >
> > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Is /etc/spamassassin where the rest of your site config is located? Typically
> it's /etc/mail/spamassassin, but "spamassassin -D --lint" would tell you.
>
Hi,
Yes /et
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:06:51AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Is it scoring the whitelist lower or is it just not hitting?
>
> Can you post your whitelist rule and the headers from an example
> message?
Hi, Apologies for delay I did not see this message. I am still having
issues with this so yo
Hi All,
I have not got to the bottom of this. Does anyone know how to report on
whether a mail is having points deducted because it is whitelisted?
Regards,
Mark
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:34:58PM +, Mark Adams wrote:
> Thanks for that,
>
> The lint has not complained about a
Thanks for that,
The lint has not complained about any config problems with the line you
have suggested. Do you know a quick and easy way of testing whether the
whitelisting is working correctly? I have a reporting template setup as
below, but this never shows any whitelist hits. (I'm probably jus
Hi All,
Quick questions regarding whitelisting. I have read that whitelisting
applies -50 points whether using whitelist_from or whitelist_from_rcvd.
My question is can this amount be altered?
Thanks for any help.
Regards,
Mark
Thanks, It is using both directories. It appears that it isn't
subtracting the 50 points that it is supposed to when it is whitelisted?
Do you know if this setting is changeable?
Regards,
Mark
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:15:17AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Mark Adams wrote:
>
Hi There,
SA 3.1.7-1.
I have setup openprotect http://saupdates.openprotect.com/
Ever since I set it up my whitelists have not worked, these are located
in /etc/spamassassin
I thought that spamassassin checked both of these directories for rules,
Am I correct?
Thanks,
Mark
Hi All,
Spamassassin 3.1.4-1
I currently have openprotect setup to update my rules with sa-update
(http://saupdates.openprotect.com/)
after a recent update, I am now recieving undefined dependancy
issues when I restart spamassassin as follows;
Dec 14 15:04:37 hopnet spamd[18571]: logger: removi
right folder... Might be
> worth a try
>
I have done this, but the issue is still occurring. Has anyone else seen
this or have any suggestions?
>
>
> Robert
>
>
>
Regards,
Mark
>
>
>
> Peace he would say instead of goodbyepeace my brother.
&g
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 05:55:24PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> Mark Adams wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >Spamassassin 3.1.4-1
> >
> >Currently have entries like the following in the local.cf file
> >
> >whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >and
> >whiteli
Hi All,
Spamassassin 3.1.4-1
Currently have entries like the following in the local.cf file
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But mail is still picked up as spam for the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have also tried the following;
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Graham, Thanks for your reply,
> NOT TESTED, but would probably work - as the first part of your RCPT ACL:
>
> deny message = No such user
> domains = westonwilliamson.com
> local_parts = vcswestonwilliamsonpoh
>
This worked exactly as required - thanks for this.
>
>
> This morning I am receiving emails but not sure everything is "normal"
> yet. My belief is that there are multiple problems with our domain that
> is causing my email problems. I would more than welcome any and all
> assistance. Thank you.
>
>
What is your exchange server hosting? pop3? I
Hi All,
We are running exim4.62-4 with Spamassassin 3.1.4-4 on Debian testing
and are suffering extremely high IO Wait times on the server whenever
spamassassin scans an incoming email. Exim4 is setup as defaults (spamd
running locally on standard port) so no configuration was changed.
Spamassas
28 matches
Mail list logo
