Re[6]: after upgrade

2004-10-12 Thread Marcos Saint';Anna
/spamd.log Is this a bug? Is there any kind of impact or any problem to the system if I use this parameter --max-conn-per-child=1 till a solution be found ? Once again, THANKS INDEED for your time also for your patience. :) BTW: Thanks to trying understand my english! :D Best regards -

Re[4]: after upgrade

2004-10-12 Thread Marcos Saint';Anna
Hello guys, I didn't quote the last mails to make this e-mail a little shorter :) Before anything else, thanks indeed for your time, also for your patience. BTW... I already made, at least, two complete uninstalls.. cleaned up the entire system, then installed SA 3.0 again. After 3 nig

Re[2]: after upgrade

2004-10-10 Thread Marcos Saint';Anna
9,MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.177, MISSING_MIMEOLE=0.012 autolearn=unavailable version=3.0.0 --- As you may see... the configuration files are the same, also the binaries are using the same version. I really don't know whats going on... :( Th

Re[2]: SA 3.0 - USER_IN_BLACKLIST false positive?

2004-10-10 Thread Marcos Saint';Anna
Hello Mike, Almost the same thing here... but it's the USER_IN_WHITELIST that's making me nuts. My configuration files have no whitelist_from... but in the detection description the USER_IN_WHITELIST is always there... Best regards -- Marcos Saint'Anna [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: after upgrade

2004-10-10 Thread Marcos Saint';Anna
that I've read several times the INSTALL and UPGRADE instructions before do the upgrade... Best regards -- Marcos Saint'Anna [EMAIL PROTECTED] You wrote: MK> At 08:42 PM 10/9/2004 -0300, Marcos Saint'Anna wrote: >>SPAM... So I noticed that almost all headers had a "U

after upgrade

2004-10-09 Thread Marcos Saint';Anna
log Thanks in advance! Best regards -- Marcos Saint'Anna [EMAIL PROTECTED]