Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST

"My Break-Dancing days are over, but there's always the Funky Chicken" -- The Full Monty > On Jul 7, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Sidney Markowitz wrote: > > Lorenzo Thurman wrote on 8/07/16 3:03 AM: >>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:14 AM, Antony Stone >>> wrote:

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST

"My Break-Dancing days are over, but there's always the Funky Chicken" -- The Full Monty > On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:14 AM, Antony Stone > wrote: > > On Thursday 07 July 2016 at 15:08:44, Lorenzo Thurman wrote: > >>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Reindl Har

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST

"My Break-Dancing days are over, but there's always the Funky Chicken" -- The Full Monty > On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > >> Am 07.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Joe Quinn: >>> On 7/6/2016 11:42 PM, Bill Cole wrote: >>> On 6 Jul 2016, at 23:10, lorenzo wrote: >>> >>> [...

USER_IN_WHITELIST

I’ve been receiving some spam where spamassassin identifies the sender with USER_IN_WHITELIST. These senders (or domains) are most definitely not in my whitelist. How can I get around this problem? Thanks

Re: Spamassassin not catching spam (Follow-up)

> On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 24.03.2015 um 20:10 schrieb Lorenzo Thurman: >> I contacted the list a couple of weeks ago about SA not missing a lot of >> spam I thought it should be catching. There duplicates of message that I >&g

Spamassassin not catching spam (Follow-up)

I contacted the list a couple of weeks ago about SA not missing a lot of spam I thought it should be catching. There duplicates of message that I had put through sa-learn, that were still getting passed. One of the suggestions offered here, after posting my command line here, was that I should r

Re: Improve spam hit rate

> On Mar 10, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 10.03.2015 um 18:29 schrieb Lorenzo Thurman: >> I have these messages in a paste: http://pastebin.com/jNQfRerx. They >> were received about 1 1/2 hours apart. After I received the first one, I >> ra

Improve spam hit rate

I have these messages in a paste: http://pastebin.com/jNQfRerx . They were received about 1 1/2 hours apart. After I received the first one, I ran sudo sa-learn —spam /path/to/mail/folder against it and then sudo sa-learn —sync. spamassasin reported that it ‘learne

Re: Spamassasin not as effective anymore

On Sep 29, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Mark London wrote: > On 9/29/2014 12:58 PM, Mark London wrote: >> On 9/29/2014 4:21 AM, users-digest-h...@spamassassin.apache.org wrote: >>> >>> From: Lorenzo Thurman >>> Date: 9/26/2014 10:59 PM >>> I’ve been using spa

Re: Spamassasin not as effective anymore

combined.rbl.msrbl.net, reject_rbl_client rabl.nuclearelephant.com, permit My DNS forwards queries. I hope this is enough. Thanks On Sep 27, 2014, at 7:02 AM, Axb wrote: > On 09/27/2014 04:59 AM, Lorenzo Thurman wrote: >> I’ve be using spamassasin for a number of years with excellent results. But

Spamassasin not as effective anymore

I’ve be using spamassasin for a number of years with excellent results. But, now over the last month or so, it has been scoring spam very low. It still catches most spam, but whereas only about a dozen or so might get through to my inbox in a week, I’m suddenly getting a dozen or so a day. I run