Hi,
I see a lot of forking ever since I switched to 3.1. Is there a
way to tell the maximum and the average number of forks reached?
If so, would it be more efficient in terms of speed to switch
back to the old method or the difference is really negligible
up to a certain number of forks?
Thnx,
Nathanael Hoyle wrote:
abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
They are also in this list as well as
postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sucks that microsoft can just do whatever they want
since they have sooo
many users, but as this is the current state of our
reality, I am interested
in what people are doing to deal with it as is.
Removed sorbs, no choice.
Is this causing anyone else probl
. What about the other three,
especially the one about "Error creating a DNS resolver socket:
Permission denied"?
L
-Original Message-----
From: Lefteris Tsintjelis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 10:02 AM
Posted To: sa-users
Conversation: Spamd
This problem seems to also create another side effect. It triggers the
SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE rule incorrectly.
If it is putting one at the end and the others at the front I think it
would
be a problem and worht opening a ticket. If the way it is will work with
DomainKeys then it is probably mo
It is a known open bug. I have seen this one a few time so far here also.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4541
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
We are running the following on Solaris 2.6:
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0
running on Perl version 5.8.5
We have noticed the following erro
Loren Wilton wrote:
If it is putting one at the end and the others at the front I think it would
be a problem and worht opening a ticket. If the way it is will work with
DomainKeys then it is probably more an annoyance than a problem.
It always does exactly that and it is annoying as you say.
Loren Wilton wrote:
Since everything moved up in SA 3.1 (it will take time to get
used to this one) shouldn't also X-Spam-Prev-Subject move up
there with the rest of X-Spam-...? IMHO, I find it more
Sounds like a bug to me if they aren't all in the same place.
Nope, they are not. In fact, I
Hi,
Since everything moved up in SA 3.1 (it will take time to get
used to this one) shouldn't also X-Spam-Prev-Subject move up
there with the rest of X-Spam-...? IMHO, I find it more
practical to have everything in one place. BTW, doesn't this
effect Domain-Key's compatibility?
Thnx,
Lefteris
Hi,
I have just caught a couple of perl buggers in my logs with 3.1.0:
Can't locate LMAP/CID2SPF.pm in @INC (@INC contains: lib ../lib
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/mach
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl
/usr/local/
Hi,
Just upgraded to 3.1.0 and turned on the DCC plugin but a debugging shows:
[2471] warn: reporter: DCC report failed: reporter: exited with non-zero exit
code 67
[2471] info: reporter: could not report spam to DCC
I have also searched around but not much found about this other
that the -x 0
Hi,
How can I find the oldest token in db? I am using SA 3.0.4 with MySQL.
Thanks,
Lefteris
The following patches apply to SA 3.0.4 only. Adds a new parameter to local.cf:
use_spamcop ( 0 | 1 )
*** Conf.pm.origMon Jun 6 04:31:23 2005
--- Conf.pm Wed Sep 14 23:27:06 2005
***
*** 1108,1113
--- 1108,1125
}
});
+ =item use_spamcop ( 0 | 1 )
Anybody got an idea
how to prevent that confirmation?
Use spamcop_to_address "quick." instead of "submit." but thats something
you have to activate. The site has further info about this.
I prefer to send it immediately which makes the updates of DCC and
razor even faster.
How do you do it? Do you report back automatically every detected SPAM?
That shouldn't be done, as I read from the homepage.
Not out of the box, I agree with that. I am using 3 threshold levels
and tested,
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 22:15 Markus Eskola wrote:
Just a quick question regarding the reporting... Do you guys report
all spam (including the once that SA allready caught) or only the
ones that got thru the net?
All, with no exceptions made.
I believe it shou
Yes, I was very "Hmm" myself about this one... but anyway...
Great idea, just tried it but didn't work, can I assume then that there is
no proper way of turning this thing off other than hacking the code? Nothing
else is mentioned about the SpamCop plugin other than those three things and
googlin
y in /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre and restart
> spamd/amavis-new/MailScanner/whatever and it will disable the plugin.
>
> --
> Martin Hepworth
> Snr Systems Administrator
> Solid State Logic
> Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lef
Hi,
I am using SA 3.0.4. I was wondering if it is possible to turn off the spamcop
reporting plugin without recompiling, and how?
Thanks in advance
19 matches
Mail list logo
