Re: has SA 3.3.1 been recalled?

2010-03-28 Thread Klaus Heinz
Justin Mason wrote: > all active mirrors should be updated by now. if anyone runs into this, just > save yourself the bother and immediately switch to > http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/source/ and download directly from > the source. The original rule archive Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.1

sa-compile on Solaris (Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available)

2007-05-10 Thread Klaus Heinz
Duane Hill wrote: > 2) In the Makefile, it states sa-compile doesn't work on FreeBSD and > Solaris if you elect to use it and try doing a 'make' from the port > directory. Can anyone tell me what is supposed to be broken on Solaris concerning sa-compile? I built SA 3.2.0 using the package from

Re: sa-compile Problem

2007-05-06 Thread Klaus Heinz
Wolfgang Breyha wrote: > But after restarting spamd I get lots of message complaining about missing > body_400.pm up to body_1000.pm and same for body_neg400.pm to body_neg1000.pm. ^^^ Are you sure about this one? I have not seen this yet. > > eg.: > Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Co

Re: error on reporting

2005-11-13 Thread Klaus Heinz
Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:37:05AM +0100, Michael Monnerie wrote: > > [23883] warn: reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory > > reporter: razor2 had unknown error during authenticate > > > > I'm getting this error now on the script that reports SPAM. Wh

SPF tests working in 3.1.0?

2005-11-12 Thread Klaus Heinz
Hi, is the test t/spf.t from SA 3.1.0 supposed to succeed? All the SPF_HELO_* tests fail for me (Mail-SPF-Query 1.996 or 1.997, Net-DNS-0.49). I get ===> Testing for spamassassin-3.1.0 PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/pkg/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')