Re: Development dead

2009-11-04 Thread Kent Borg
I admit I have been ignoring Spamassassin because it seems to work. I have been pleased that Spamassassin has been regularly flagging over 94% of my spam. And this list seems active (if mostly ignored by me). But this e-mail caught my eye. Indeed, the version on spamassassin.org is old and the

Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin

2007-10-16 Thread Kent Borg
I am also running an old version (3.1.7 on Ubuntu 7.04). Between SA and Thunderbird's own spam features, I am detecting something between 75% and 80% of spam. How much better is 3.2.x? Thanks, -kb