don't see where they are scored
negatively. Have those rules been obsoleted?
If I wanted to add a point for messages coming from The Bat!, how would
I write that rule?
Thanks!
Ken Morley
Here's a sample. Note that I'm also using Passive OS Fingerprinting,
which doesn
f
altering each e-mail by changing the recipient and adding several
X-Amavisd headers and I understand that might impact Bayes accuracy.
It's also a pain...
I'm curious: how do the rest of you approach this problem?
Thanks!
Ken Morley
I'm running SpamAssassin 3.2.3 and have been advised to increase the
score for URIBL_SBL to 5.0. I see where it is defined in 50_scores.cf,
but I don't completely understand the format.
Mine shows:
score URIBL_SBL 0 2.468 0 1.499 # n=0 n=2
Is the last score (1.499) the one I should increase? We
change.hoovers.com a:mail.eca.com include:dartmail.net ~all"
The sending server is hamhock-outbound.hoovers.com [66.179.38.26] and
that IP address is within the range listed in the first SPF entry. Why
did this fail?
Thanks!
Ken Morley
JM Technology Group
Ken -AT- jmtg.com
REJECT
Header X-Mailer indicates message sent by spambot
I’ll remove GoldMine…
Thanks again for the assistance and I apologize for being OT
on this one.
Ken Morley
Drew Burchett wrote:
> I made this same mistake yesterday.
Turned out that I hadn’t enabled razor in v310.pre.
Thanks very much for the reply Drew!
I found that the line loading the Razor plug-in in v310.pre
was commented out:
# Razor2 - perform Razor2 message checks.
#
# Ra
"Tim Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ø That message
hasn't come from SpamAssassin, it's from an MTA. Either you
> have something in your MTA config that is doing it, or it's been
> rejected by a mailserver before it gets to you (check your
have permissions set at 750. I can successfully "cat
/var/amavis/.razor/razor-agent.conf". Why does SA fail to
parse the line?
Thanks!
Ken Morley
ittle too general as many legitimate messages
are originated from GoldMine's MUA.
Thanks!
Ken Morley