On Thursday 14 July 2011 06:13:39 Yves Goergen wrote:
> On 12.07.2011 10:39 CE(S)T, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> > There is the other thread about some patching for IPv6, but could someone
> > post the current status with this problem or some idea what should be
> > done for now
I wonder how good or bad is my idea to temporarily not load Botnet module?
That results in some repeated warnings, but if I load it, there are even more
warnings like these:
spamd[2882]: Argument "2607:fe70:0:4::a" isn't numeric in multiplication (*)
at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.12.3/Mail/Sp
On Friday 08 July 2011 17:34:13 Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > On Friday 08 July 2011 17:00:50 Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> >> Do you need spamd changing OS user ids? (e.g. to access
> >> ~/.spamassassin/ )
> >
> > No, I don't!
>
> one could ask how to configure it
A small server. And configuration is
On Friday 08 July 2011 16:54:22 Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:41:36 +0000, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> > All,
> > I'd like you to review approximately how I'm running spamd. My
> > concern
> > is security. You can see that the child processes are ru
All,
I'd like you to review approximately how I'm running spamd. My concern
is security. You can see that the child processes are run by spamd user,
but the main process is still run by root:
ps -C spamd -o user,cmd
USER CMD
root /usr/sbin/spamd -d -r /var/run/spamd.pid -m 2 -u spamd --nou
On Thursday 07 July 2011 16:46:42 Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> Have you considered using Shortcircuit plugin?
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit
Partially I use it. I gave up for anything more than using it with
whitelist_from.
On Thursday 07 July 2011 14:16:00 Axb wrote:
> On 2011-07-07 16:10, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> >If whitelist_auth, about 16 secs
> > (hashes are still computed and compared!).
>
> I assume you're not using local resolver or you have a thin/throttled
> pipe (many D
It seems that while processing an email from address, which is marked as
whitelist_auth, still hashes are computed. I've set "shortcircuit
USER_IN_WHITELIST on" and it works well (no hashes computed) if address is
marked as whitelist_from... Any idea on how to faster process mail form
adresses
On Thursday 07 July 2011 09:52:36 Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 08:27 +0000, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> > as per my current SA setup it takes quite a while until all tests are
> > over and the mail is delivered.
>
> How are you running SA? If you're explic
Hi all,
as per my current SA setup it takes quite a while until all tests are
over and the mail is delivered. Thus it seemed necessary to do some
white-listing to save time. The problem is: even though an address is
white-listed with "whitelist_from", still DNS lookups are done, hashes
are compute
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 12:09:50 Frank Heydlauf wrote:
> Hi K??rlis,
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 08:50:24AM +, K??rlis Repsons wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 February 2010 18:18:01 Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > spamassassin --debug info -r
> ...
>
> > Does the thing, but with one
On Tuesday 16 February 2010 18:18:01 Mark Martinec wrote:
> > > I'd appreciate a pointer how should spamassassin -r be made more
> > > verbose, so that it'd report also messages with priority "info", but
> > > not "dbg"...
> >
> > spamassassin --debug area=noall -r
> Sorry, wrong syntax, should b
People,
I'd appreciate a pointer how should spamassassin -r be made more verbose, so
that it'd report also messages with priority "info", but not "dbg"...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi again,
[hopefully that is not- or documented somewhere deep]
presumably, when all spam reporting methods have failed, I get this warning:
"warn: spamassassin: warning, unable to report message".
My question: is there some way to set the obligatory report methods, missing
any of which would re
People,
in trying to set up Razor2 sitewide, I found some things, which were not so
good about the wikipage [1]. As per me, it would be this way (and it works):
I What was wrong
1. no need calling razor-client
2. no need to touch /etc/spamassassin, just /etc/spamassassin/.razor
3. cd .razor &&
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 15:08:01 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 02.02.10 11:47, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> > in fact, all spam filters are normally designed with an intent to get rid
> > of spam, not ham, but anyway, I'm confused with my possible chances to
> > mis
Hi,
in fact, all spam filters are normally designed with an intent to get rid of
spam, not ham, but anyway, I'm confused with my possible chances to miss some
mails for no really valid reason. I've seen that long list in [1], but that
doesn't say much of what should be avoided. For example, I re
On Saturday 30 January 2010 16:55:54 Dale Carstensen wrote:
> > The Postfix program
> >
> >: host mx1.us.apache.org[140.211.11.136]
> > said: 552 spam score (10.4) exceeded threshold (in reply to end of DATA
> > command)
>
> Karlis,
>
> That's what the list said about my reply t
On Saturday 30 January 2010 15:48:36 Jeff Mincy wrote:
> BAYES_99,DCC_CHECK,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_FIVETEN_SPAM,RCVD_IN_NIX
> SPAM,RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1,RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2,RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3,BOTNET,BOT
> NET_BADDNS
>
> Botnet/FIVETEN/NIXSPAM/UCEPROTECT are additional rules added.
>
> -je
On Saturday 30 January 2010 13:54:14 Jeff Mincy wrote:
> Retrain the message correctly in Bayes. Bayes will catch on to this
> after a few times. The subject alone should be a strong enough clue
> for bayes (I get BAYES_80 on this partial sample), so it looks like
> you are doing only autolearn a
On Saturday 30 January 2010 13:51:18 Mike Cardwell wrote:
> By forwarding the email the way you have, your email client has stripped
> out most of the useful header information. Try pasting the message
> including the full set of headers into http://spamalyser.com/ or
> http://pastebin.com/ or simi
People,
perhaps its simple to be done, but I personally would like to know the ways to
get rid of something like this:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: marty rizin g suppe r socio logy mason ing
Date: Friday 29 January 2010
From: "Cheap Tamiflu on www.ra97.com"
To: reps...@
Hello spam assassins,
The question, which bothers me is about Bayes data size. How much is a typical
size of those data and what mechanisms are there to limit growing of it? Can
mysql be used for storage and would you recommend it (well, maybe it can then
be easier to share Spamassassin knowledg
23 matches
Mail list logo
