> On 12/11/2017 01:19 PM, Junk wrote:
>> I wonder in addition to what recomened i could add to increase the
>> score.
>> I am browsing through the archives to learn more but if you think of
>> something quick i could try.
>> Switching to postfix is my next goal b
S Dept.
> 155 South Seward Street
> Juneau, Alaska 99801
> Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No:
> 307357
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Junk [mailto:j...@lexoncom.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 1:36 PM
> To: Kevin Mille
postscreen?
If i understand it correctly this feature allows to stop email from being
delivered before it gets through MTA.
So spam assassin does same filtering but it requires more processing?
thx
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 04.12.2017 um 23:17 schrie
So I wonder if
postscreen_dnsbl is enabled is it possible that mail get lost by mistake?
Somehow some false positive?
How do you maintain the list?
> On 12/02/2017 09:09 PM, Junk wrote:
>> Is there any list that can be trusted and is publicly available or
>> unless you pay not
Thx I willl look at it.
I started with send mail and for used to it so i would have to read more about
postfix etc.
> On Dec 3, 2017, at 7:42 AM, David Jones wrote:
>
>> On 12/02/2017 09:03 PM, Junk wrote:
>> I am using sendmail.
>
> It's pretty easy to switch
Is there any list that can be trusted and is publicly available or unless you
pay nothing is trusted?
> On Dec 2, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
>> On 2 Dec 2017, at 13:33 (-0500), David Jones wrote:
>>
>> Then you can start experimenting with RBLs at
>> http://multirbl.valli.org/lo
> On Dec 2, 2017, at 12:53 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2017, Junk wrote:
>
>>> If you trust your Bayes you might consider implementing a BAYES_999 rule
>>> that adds another point.
>>
>> I might look into it
>>
>>>
I am using sendmail.
> On Dec 2, 2017, at 12:33 PM, David Jones wrote:
>
>> On 12/02/2017 10:39 AM, Junk wrote:
>> i implemented all of the filters yo mentioned and the score went up from
>> 3.5. to 3.9 on an example spam email i was testing.
>> I will look furth
y.net
>
> To mention just a few...
>
>
> ...Kevin
> --
> Kevin Miller
> Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
> 155 South Seward Street
> Juneau, Alaska 99801
> Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No: 307357
>
>
> -Ori
> On Dec 1, 2017, at 7:07 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2017, Junk wrote:
>
>> Thx for the tips.
>> I will look at theses and try to implement.
>> I definitely need more ways to get more scores so those that score 3.4-4.9
>> finally go over 5 an
Thx for the tips.
I will look at theses and try to implement.
I definitely need more ways to get more scores so those that score 3.4-4.9
finally go over 5 and are marked spam.
> On Dec 1, 2017, at 5:05 PM, Kevin Miller wrote:
>
> HashBL
; Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No:
> 307357
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Junk [mailto:j...@lexoncom.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 12:19 PM
> To: Kevin Miller
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: FIlter
>
> I
hing. Tailor the scores as
> necessary to tune your system if the defaults aren't a good match for your
> corpus of messages.
>
> ...Kevin
> --
> Kevin Miller
> Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
> 155 South Seward Street
> Juneau, Alaska 99801
> Phone: (907)
South Seward Street
> Juneau, Alaska 99801
> Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No: 307357
> -Original Message-
> From: Junk [mailto:j...@lexoncom.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 6:31 AM
> To: Benny Pedersen
> Cc: Junk; users@spam
right, did not read it correctly.
>
>
> Am 01.12.2017 um 17:00 schrieb Junk:
>> You calling me an idiot based on what?
>
> learn to read emails!
> i repsonded to Benny's clueless "apt-get install bind9"
>
>> According to URIBL:
>>
>&g
let me try if i can change the port to something else and then configure
firewall to forward from that port to the dns server on my network.
>
>
> Am 01.12.2017 um 01:22 schrieb Junk:
>> I am aware of uridb blocked.
>> My server is in amazon cloud and uridb is blocked.
>
> Am 01.12.2017 um 09:50 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
>> Junk skrev den 2017-12-01 05:35:
>>> I understand your concern and I agree but like I said at this point I
>>> cannot get over the dns issue unless you give me a dns server ip that
>>> will respond to m
> Junk skrev den 2017-12-01 05:35:
>> I understand your concern and I agree but like I said at this point I
>> cannot get over the dns issue unless you give me a dns server ip that
>> will respond to my queries for the uribl.
>
> apt-get install bind9
>
you did not
I understand your concern and I agree but like I said at this point I cannot
get over the dns issue unless you give me a dns server ip that will respond to
my queries for the uribl.
My original question was about specific filter.
> On Nov 30, 2017, at 6:59 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
at 5:00 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> Junk skrev den 2017-11-30 23:46:
>
>> Nov 30 16:45:22.663 [11935] dbg: uridnsbl: nt.ee . multi.uribl.com ->
>> 127.0.0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED, subtest:1
>
> fix this problem first
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsB
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 6:06 PM, Jim McLachlan wrote:
>
> Sorry, I did a direct reply instead of a reply to the list. I hope this
> corrects that.
>
> Hi KAM,
>
>You're confused Not as much as me. I'm completely baffled
>
>I've posted my master.cf to http://pasted.co/ba783cac just
After retraining and setting spam assassin for wide site all looks good.
Spam gets bayes99 and non spam is bayes00.
So far i did not get any spam.
Thank you all for your help.
>>
>>
>> Am 31.10.2015 um 16:06 schrieb j...@lexoncom.com:
>>> So after initial learning it looks better now. (BAYES_50)
>
>
>
> Am 31.10.2015 um 16:06 schrieb j...@lexoncom.com:
>> So after initial learning it looks better now. (BAYES_50)
>
> BAYES_50 is not really good for clear spam
>
yep i though that bayes was used but it seems like it was all useless
>> When sendmail sends email to procmail and procmail passes i
So after initial learning it looks better now. (BAYES_50)
When sendmail sends email to procmail and procmail passes it to spam
assassin, does spam assassin runs as root user or as the user the email
is destined to?
I run the sa-learn as root user and it seems like this is the data based
that is be
thx, that explains the issue.
I setup a dns server outside the amazon server.
Now, i can finally do the lookup:
root@aws:~# host -tTXT 2.0.0.127.multi.uribl.com
2.0.0.127.multi.uribl.com descriptive text "permanent testpoint"
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.0 req
Further testing shows that both smazon and my public ips are blocked.
I never used my public ip for dns so why is it blocked?
Is it just my bad luck and the ip is just blocked on URBL?
root@aws:/home/user#
root@aws:/home/user# host -tTXT 2.0.0.127.multi.uribl.com
2.0.0.127.multi.uribl.com descrip
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>
>> I already cleaned the db to make sure I dont have it broken.
>> Would it be better to turn off the autolearn.
>> Teach sa ham and spam from over 200 messages and then turn back the
>> autolearn?
>
> How big is your userbase and ham email volume?
I already cleaned the db to make sure I dont have it broken.
Would it be better to turn off the autolearn.
Teach sa ham and spam from over 200 messages and then turn back the
autolearn?
thx
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:19 -0500, j...@lexoncom.com wro
If auto learn is enabled and header shows:
autolearn=ham
what happens when i classify that email later as spam?
thx
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:19 -0500, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>> I dont use any ham training.Should I scan all my folders with this
>> command:
>> sa-learn --ham --mbox /home/user
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:19 -0500, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>> I dont use any ham training.Should I scan all my folders with this
>> command:
>> sa-learn --ham --mbox /home/username/mail/foldername
>>
> YES - if Bayes never gets trained on ham, how do you expect it to
> recognise the difference b
> On Thursday 29 October 2015 at 18:29:27, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>
>> I use procmail
>>
>> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
>> * < 256000
>> | spamassassin
>>
>> I run
>> sudo spamassassin -t -d --mbox /home/user/mail/INBOX.spamtest
>>
>> sudo spamassassin --mbox /home/user/mail/INBOX.spamtest
>>
>> ther
I get this warning while running spam assassin from the command line:
Oct 29 11:54:38.803 [26126] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure dependency
in require while running with -T switch at
/usr/lib/perl5/Net/DNS/RR/OPT.pm line 6.
Oct 29 11:54:38.803 [26126] warn: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted a
Is there a way to learn what bayes learned so far?
> On Oct 27, 2015, at 4:35 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>>
>> example mail sa headers:
>
> Is this from a spam?
>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
>> ip-10-254-37
yes there might be few emails there that were legitimate
i cleaned it but i did not have time to do it property
are not
net/RBL/DNSBL tests
enabled by default?
i need to review the documentation and see why it does not work
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>
>> try this
>> https:
try this
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ngmaryggdelecjq/INBOX.spam?dl=0
it is mbox file with like 1000 spam messages that are not recognized as spam
> On 28/10/2015 07:38, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>> i uploaded my inbox with all spam that does not get filtered
>>
>> https://mega.nz/#!IRhlyQLL
>>
>
> 1
thx, yes i did that but found old doc and that option was not available:
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
>
> Am 27.10.2015 um 21:02 schrieb j...@lexoncom.com:
>> SO i setup the dns server.
>> Can i force spam assassin to use localhost for dns or I must re
SO i setup the dns server.
Can i force spam assassin to use localhost for dns or I must reconfigure
the host?
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
>>
>> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZ
RMA-BROWN
> tflags RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR net
> score RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR 1.0
>
>
> Also - add a highest numbers MX record tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com
>
> This will help tune our list to your spam and also get rid of a lot od it.
>
> On 10/27/15 10:50, j...@lexoncom.com
I understand now.
sa-learn --ham --no-rebuild ham_directory
sa-learn --spam --no-rebuild spam_directory
sa-learn --rebuild
so would the best practice to be move spam to spam folder and learn as spam
and learn all other folders as ham and then rebuild.
The inbox would never be scanned as it might h
different mbox. (This one is optional.)
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/var/spool/mail/junk
# All mail tagged as spam (eg. with a score higher than the set threshold)
# is moved to "probably-spam".
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/var/spool/mail/junk
>
>
> Am 27
I use spam assassin with razors on ubuntu server.
In recent months i started to get tons of spam.
Spam assassin does not catch it and scores are very low.
Are those emails fabricated so well that they look like legitimate? Can i
do something to catch those as spam?
I moved them all to one folder
41 matches
Mail list logo
