RE: Move SPAM to directory and notify user

] Enviado el: Viernes, 09 de Julio de 2010 11:50 a.m. Para: users@spamassassin.apache.org Asunto: Re: Move SPAM to directory and notify user On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote: > In a CentOS 4.7 server I installed qmail + simscan + ClamAV + Spamassassin > 3.3.0 that is working pr

Move SPAM to directory and notify user

Dear Sirs, In a CentOS 4.7 server I installed qmail + simscan + ClamAV + Spamassassin 3.3.0 that is working properly. Now my intention is that when a mail is considered SPAM this is moved to a folder called SPAM and in turn notifies the user (via email) so you can review it. Is it possible?

Error Spamassassin with pyzor

wrong? Thanks Jose Luis Additional Information Centos 4.8 Spamassassin 3.3.1 perl 5.8.5-49.el4 python 2.3.4-14.7.el4_8.2 pyzor --homedir /etc/mail/spamassassin ping public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') my local.cf ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 1 required_hits 3 report_safe 0 rewr

RE: Problems with whitelists and simscan

Hi Rick, Thanks for your answer. So for these cases as could do to work whitelists? It can be solution in spamassassin or simscan? Thanks Jose Luis > Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:23:02 -0500 > From: ri...@ummm-beer.com > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Problems wit

Problems with whitelists and simscan

-21:65.55.34.24:jolumape...@hotmail.com:lca...@enlaceaduanero.com.pe,jma...@enlaceaduanero.com.pe What is wrong? Thanks Jose Luis SETTINGS: Mail Server: Qmail + Spamassassin + ClamAV + Simscan /etc/init.d/spamassassin.rc #!/bin/sh # spamassassin This script starts and stops the spamd daemon # P

RE: spamd SIGCHLD

Dear Bowie, I have increased the maximum amount of SPARE to 5 (--max-spare=5) and I'm monitoring the behavior of the RAM and SWAP. Thanks Jose Luis > Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:42:36 -0500 > From: bowie_bai...@buc.com > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject:

RE: spamd SIGCHLD

Dear John, Thanks, now I have the concept more clear about this. Jose Luis I'm more clear about this. > Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:39:08 -0800 > From: jhar...@impsec.org > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > CC: bowie_bai...@buc.com > Subject: RE: spamd SIGCHLD > >

RE: spamd SIGCHLD

Thanks Bowie, It would be good idea to increase the maximum amount of SPARE? Thanks Jose Luis > Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:30:58 -0500 > From: bowie_bai...@buc.com > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: spamd SIGCHLD > > Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote: > >

RE: spamd SIGCHLD

ion @40004afb1ab223d341cc [12572] info: prefork: child states: II Any comments? Thanks Jose Luis From: jolumape...@hotmail.com To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: spamd SIGCHLD Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:49:22 -0500 Dear Sirs, In reviewing log of SA I found that there are many messages

spamd SIGCHLD

/bin/spamd -v -u vpopmail -m 10 -x -q -s stderr -r /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid -i 172.16.10.20 -A 172.16.10.0/24 2>&1 | \ Thanks Jose Luis _ Discover the new Windows Vista http://search.

Questions about SA

ts.pl". Thanks Jose Luis _ Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger  http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline

RE: Problems with high spam

s can be a problem for SpamAssassin? - Which tool can I use to get statistics of SpamAssassin, I am currently using the script "sa-stats.pl". Thanks Jose Luis > Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:33:26 -0700 > From: jhar...@impsec.org > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subj

RE: Problems with high spam

ble-dropmsg=y --enable-custom-smtp-reject=n --enable-per-domain=y --enable-attach=y --enable-spam=y --enable-ripmime=/usr/local/bin/ripmime --enable-received=y --enable-spam-hits=5.0 --enable-spamc=/usr/bin/spamc --enable-spamc-args=-s 20 -t 60 -d 172.16.10.20 --enable-spamc-user=y --enable-regex=

RE: Problems with high spam

Dear Sirs, So runs Spamd /usr/bin/spamd -v -u vpopmail -m 20 -x -q -s stderr -r /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid If I have about 10,000 emails to have less processes SpamD (Example 5) did not cause problems? Thanks Jose Luis > From: ja...@iki.fi > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Su

RE: Problems with high spam

22 78 -/+ buffers/cache:218282 Swap: 1027 38988 Load 13:02:27 up 35 days, 21:49, 4 users, load average: 21.76, 21.17, 17.37 Was solved by restarting SA This is due to lack of server resources? Thanks Jose Luis > From: list...@abba

RE: Problems with high spam

imagine it will be by RBL in MTA) But the percentage of spam also decreased, this concerns me because some of the comments from the list indicated that this percentage is much higher than HAM As might improve my antispam system? Thanks Jose Luis > Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:18:34 +0

RE: Problems with high spam

e.sa-update.dostech.net" >> /etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt echo "70_sare_whitelist_rcvd.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net" >> /etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt echo "70_sare_whitelist_spf.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net" &g

RE: Problems with high spam

t of mails before the SA can analyze. 2. I am using any third-party SA. But I will install now. Thanks for your reply Jose Luis > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:00:12 -0700 > From: jhar...@impsec.org > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > CC: aawo...@gmail.com > Subject: RE: Pro

RE: Problems with high spam

Jose Luis > Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:36:24 -0400 > Subject: Re: Problems with high spam > From: aawo...@gmail.com > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 09:58 -0500, Jose Luis Marin Pere

RE: Problems with high spam

used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 501284216 0 24 41 -/+ buffers/cache:218282 Swap: 1027 59968 Thanks for your time and support. Jose Luis > Subject: Re: Problems with high s

RE: Problems with high spam

Thanks for the answers > Subject: RE: Problems with high spam > From: guent...@rudersport.de > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:45:23 +0200 > > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:27 -0500, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote: > > > > > > 512 MB R

RE: Problems with high spam

Thanks for the answers > Subject: RE: Problems with high spam > From: guent...@rudersport.de > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:45:22 +0200 > > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 16:13 -0500, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote: > > > > 512 MB Ram > >

RE: Problems with high spam

Dear Sirs, Thanks for your answers. > Subject: Re: Problems with high spam > From: guent...@rudersport.de > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:41:31 +0200 > > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 13:51 -0500, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote: > > I have th

[no subject]

60 -U /tmp/spamd.sock" --enable-spamc-user=y --enable-regex=y --with-pcre-include=/usr/local/include --enable-quarantinedir At present all emails are considered SPAM go to the quarantine folder on the server. Thanks

Move SPAM into SPAM folder

60 -U /tmp/spamd.sock" --enable-spamc-user=y --enable-regex=y --with-pcre-include=/usr/local/include --enable-quarantinedir At present all emails are considered SPAM go to the quarantine folder on the server. Thanks

RE: Spamassassin SPF error

TECTED]> Subject: Re: > Spamassassin SPF error> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: > users@spamassassin.apache.org> > Jose Luis wrote:> > Thanks for the answer,> > > > > My mail server is qmail + clamav + sa (spf) + simscan.> > > > I do some > configur

RE: Spamassassin SPF error

0f4 [20494] dbg: spf: def_spf_whitelist_from: already checked spf and didn't get pass, skipping whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20494] dbg: spf: whitelist_from_spf: already checked spf and didn't get pass, skipping whitelist check Thanks Jose Luis > Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:38:24 -04