I am seeing (past 4-5 days) more spam generally slipping under my scoring
settings, but in particular ED image spam with the word 'viagra' spelled
correctly in the sender and/or subject headers. I have settings for tagging and
auto discard with a 15 point spread, and this kind of stuff used to
Running SA on a Cpanel VPS that had an outage yesterday, when it came
back up SA is not using any of the user_prefs files in the individual
accounts. Support doesn't know what to do. The user_prefs are still
in the proper places but just not being read, or not influencing the
scores, no whi
I have a new client whose mail is scoring way high... several others
on the same server, different domains, score in negative numbers.
Mail sent through a mail script on this domain scores -1.0. I believe
they're using verizon dsl, windows xp w/ outlook or outlook express.
This is just goin
I am trying to install Dallas Engelken's version of sa-stats and a
rank novice I could use some help...
http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats.txt
I'm on a VPS with cpanel multiple domains. I installed this into the
cgi-bin in my domain (not the primary server domain) and it executes
I am always amazed to hear how much gets through on corporate
systems. My wife works in a corporate office with a dedicated IT
department and she says 60-70% of their total received is spam. I
would think that number to be intolerable. For instance, I have a VPS
and host about a dozen sit
I added the SARE ruleset (etc/mail/sa/local.cf) to try and catch the
pump and dumps with GIFs but the rules don't seem to be firing. Does
something need to be restarted on the server to activate new rules,
or are they just not specific to the spams being sent today? Anybody
have a rule to c
These are scoring at about 4X my threshold without the SARE stock
ruleset. You may need to tweak you scoring. I find bayes_99 to be
reliable.
FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL
FORGED_RCVD_HELO
BAYES_99
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL
On Nov 20, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Nathan Zabaldo wrote:
I am getting
I'm seeing stock scams slipping slipping through. Six during the
night scoring from 3.5-5.0 (threshold at 5.5). Funny thing is that
they don't have all addresses that usually get hit. The only test
they're triggering is bayes_95 on the standard tests.
On Nov 15, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Chris wr
ended?
John
On Apr 29, 2006, at 8:12 AM, List Mail User wrote:
...
Matt Kettler replied:
John Tice wrote:
Greetings,
This is my first post after having lurked some. So, I'm getting
these
same "RE: good" spams but they're hitting eight rules and typically
sco
Greetings,
This is my first post after having lurked some. So, I'm getting these
same "RE: good" spams but they're hitting eight rules and typically
scoring between 30 and 40. I'm really unsophisticated compared to you
guys, and it begs the question––what am I doing wrong? All I use is a
10 matches
Mail list logo
