Re: Custom To: rule variant to exclude matches?

EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i score TO_ADDRESS_BOGUS 4.0 This newly corrected rule is working exactly as expected, and as I result I no longer have to manage a complex set of white and black lists. John Minnihan wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply & bonu

Re: Custom To: rule variant to exclude matches?

Thanks for the quick reply & bonus suggestion, Matt. I'll continue modeling this now that I know !~ should function as expected, i.e. "return true if the pattern is not matched". > John Minnihan wrote: >> SA Team, >> >> I have a fully functional SA inst

Custom To: rule variant to exclude matches?

incorrect, but lint is happy with that rule as-is. Is this type of rule possible? If so, how might I implement it? -- John Minnihan Founder, Freepository http://freepository.com Software development infrastructure since 1999 Blog: http://commavee.com