hing improper. Rather, I'd say maybe the
scoring defaults should be tweaked a little bit.
--
Joe Sniderman
a spam filtering company (Junk Email
>> Filter) and if we fail to block a spam it can appear we are the
>> source.
>
> and ?, do you see your own logs who use spamcop.com as rbl ?
>
> http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/spamcop.com
>
> users of wot dont trust them
e inbound, and your customers are rejecting mails
you've already accepted on their behalf (sounds like this may be the
case) do you then generate a bounce? Could some of those bounces be what
caused the listing in the first place?
Just throwing some ideas out there..
--
Joe Sniderman
n an interesting side note, it appears your message did not
trigger the rule...
Subject: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0
tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
Maybe a string of multiple words separated by underscores is not
considered multiword...
--
Joe Sniderman
Could (gpgzip) attachments be preserved?
Probably.
> This would allow me to continue to use gpg I could ditch google and use ANY
> mail forwarding agent - even hushmail - and I could keep my professional
> life intact.
I'll take your word for it.
--
Joe Sniderman
your posts as spam:
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0
tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
HTH
--
Joe Sniderman
On 02/10/2012 02:16 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> The cluster with which I am facing problem is different one.
>
> The node for which I am getting high spam score has the following details:
>
> cloudemail5.cpgtest.ostinet.net (184.72.247.145)
No other Received lines?
--
Joe Sniderman
On 02/08/2012 12:22 PM, Joe Sniderman typed hurriedly:
> IOW, 196.254.0.0/16 no longer matches as of 3.3
Well, I meant to type 169.254.0.0/16... but then.. obvious typo is obvious.
--
Joe Sniderman
Bring this up with microsoft, have them 'fix' this.
Or better yet, the OP should bring it up with whoever is running the
test spamassassin instance and get them to upgrade it.
--
Joe Sniderman
e.
> Who thinks I'm onto something?
I think you *might* be on to something, or might not.
Here's another thought off the top of my head: looking at nameservers
and calculating average age of domains hosted on the nameservers, as
well as the average length of time that the domains hosted on the
nameservers have been on those specific nameservers...
--
Joe Sniderman
in also sees a DKIM failure. if
humans want to know that it passed for whatever reason, the
authentication-results header would still be there.
--
Joe Sniderman
ail back to sender with the last mx's ip in the error
> message and the 4xx too many
Interesting. My experience has been that Yahoo does retry at the same MX
but will not go to the next MX in response to 4yx errors. (OTOH if the
connection times out they do go on the next MX)
--
Joe Sniderman
[2] Google apps accounts however do seem to require a preexisting email
address, however gmail addresses are accepted for that purpose.
--
Joe Sniderman
client is example.com and uses mail.example.com,
you could do:
whitelist_from_rcvd *@example.com mail.example.com
to give negative points to mail from example.com that you receive from
mail.example.com.
HTH.
--
Joe Sniderman
On 01/25/2011 02:29 PM, JKL wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Is there a mailing list specifically for problems arising from
> spamass-milter?
There is a spamass-milter mailing list, yes:
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list
HTH
--
Joe Sniderman
15 matches
Mail list logo
