Before I actually write this, I'll aks to see if someone already has
done it.
On my imap server, I've got two different trash folders, one for ham,
one for spam. Nothing new there.
However, on the hour, I've got a script that runs sa-learn on them and
records three things for each message:
-
Joe Flowers wrote:
Very preliminary results are no less than AWESOME.
So... how are you implementing the "drifting" spam threshold?
- Joe
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
This actually sounds like it would be a good public DNSBL. Rather than have
everyone fingerprint, the central DNSBL would perform fingerprinting of IPs
that are requested and not in the cache, then cache the results.
Otherw
SM wrote:
At 08:54 01-12-2004, John Hardin wrote:
However, this sounds like it might be useful in Spamassassin: attempt to
contact the sender on port 25, and add a little to the spamminess score
if the connection is refused or times out.
That was the first thought through my mind when I read the o
For some time now, I've had my email system set up so that I have two
"trash" folders. One for ham-trash, and one for spam-trash. Hourly, my
system goes through them and uses them to update the Bayes database.
However, the script that does this *also* records the overall spam score
it received
Justin Mason wrote:
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5
RULE1: x x x x
RULE2: x x x x
RULE3: x x x
RULE4: x
(S1-S5 = 5 spam mails; H1-H5
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Although others have already given reasons why, I figured I'd toss in
the analogy to explain why the dude from CypherTrust in the article is
lacking in clue:
The SpamAssassin development team has been aware
On Friday 03 September 2004 09:17 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
- SpamAssassin now includes support for SPF (the Sender Policy Framework,
http://spf.pobox.com/).
Why bother with this?
http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/08/31/HNspammerstudy_1.html
Although others have already given reasons why, I
Justin Mason wrote:
that sounds pretty cool. suggestion: get it to record what rules
hit and what those rules' scores were.
Actually, I'm already doing it for Bayes. When I turned off autolearning
and went solely with manual-training of the Bayes db, I was interested
to see if Bayes, alone, w
Joe Flowers wrote:
If your "spread" is good and it's just the threshold that needs
adjusting, it would be trivial to make a rule that fires on every
message and give > it a score equal to the desired difference...
Thanks Pierre. That may be what I have to do, if noone has a better idea.
Actually,
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> SA isn't about the "average" it's about the accuracy.
If this were the case, then why aren't the spam scores
("*required_hits*") for each message either 1 or 0 and nothing else?
Oh, come on now. This is just a troll on a very legitimate and
informative statement.
No.
11 matches
Mail list logo
