-Original Message-
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2005 11:43
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes Training
> As you can see the second 'From' is the true spammer, whilst the first
> 'From' is my own reporting account. My worry here is that bay
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out a proper way how to teach spamassassin new spam.
I'm using v. 3.04. My Setup consists of Sendmail and Spamassassin (via
procmail). Subsequently mail is retrieved by users using POP3.
When spam messages and not detected, my users typically forward this spam as
an rfc82
-Original Message-
From: John Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 August 2005 09:52
To: spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Not delivering Spam with Procmail
On Monday 08 August 2005 11:29 pm, Joe Borg wrote:
> Hi,
> I've setup procmail so as to
Hi,
I've setup procmail so as to not deliver mails with a Spam score of 10 or
greater, as follows:
#Mail that scores 10 or more is not delivered to users.
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/var/spool/mail/spam
As may be observed from the above, mails with a Spam score of 10 or greater
sho
om: Sander Holthaus - Orange XL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2005 13:20
To: 'Joe Borg'
Cc: 'SPAMASSASSIN'
Subject: RE: Autolearn problem
> Hi,
> These are the lines in my local.cf:
>
> bayes_path /home/sharedspam/.spamassassin/bayes
> auto_whitelist_path
Wierdly this reports unavailable as opposed to failed.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: crisppy fernandes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2005 12:28
To: Joe Borg; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Autolearn problem
On 7/6/05, Joe Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
t: 06 July 2005 12:05
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Fwd: Autolearn problem
-- Forwarded message --
From: crisppy fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 6, 2005 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: Autolearn problem
To: Joe Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 7/6/05, Joe Borg
e-
From: crisppy fernandes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2005 11:29
To: Joe Borg
Subject: Re: Autolearn problem
On 7/6/05, Joe Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Daryl,
> Even though the Argument problem is now gone, I'm still getting
> Autolearn=fail in my spam
Hi Daryl,
Even though the Argument problem is now gone, I'm still getting
Autolearn=fail in my spam messages. I'm under the impression that
autolearning is turned on by default is this correct? What else could be the
issue?
Thanks,
Joe
-Original Message-----
From: Joe Borg [mai
Thanks Daryl,
Solved the problem. Had use_auto_whitelist with no Boolean.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2005 09:41
To: Joe Borg
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Autolearn problem
Joe Borg wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I've just upgraded from Spamassassin 2.63 to 3.04 (deleted old bayes since I
wanted new bayes). I've now noticed that in the message header I'm getting
autolearn=failed. Running spamassassin --lint gives the following result:
Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_
The general rule (I'm inclined to say the absolute and only way) with
Outlook and OE is to set up a folder, typically IMAP, and share it as a
public folder to the clients, They can then drag&drop, or
rightclick-and-Copy/Move the message into the ham or spam folder.
You then harvest the IMAP fold
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 May 2005 17:07
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Bayes DB install
On Monday 23 May 2005 16:02, Joe Borg typed:
> incorrectly trained it. Is it possible to upgrade but force spamassassin
to
> i
Hi,
I'm still pretty much a newbie to Spamassassin so please excuse me if I'm
asking an already answered questions; however, I've searched the site for an
answer and could not find one.
I'm currently running Spamassassin v. 2.63 and would like to upgrade to the
latest version in the coming weeks.
Hi,
I have a suspicion that my bayes DB has wrong entries because of the way I
previously use to train it. I used to use Outlook to bounce spam messages,
but for some reason Microsoft do not seem to implement the 'ReSent'
Header...as a result I think the bayes DB may be using my own email address
a
15 matches
Mail list logo
