enough to make that impractical?
Thanks,
Jim Smith
> I would suggest that you do as the error says and check your CRON.
>
> What do you get from 'crontab -l'?
>
Nothing very telling:
#0 0 * * * /usr/local/urchin/urchin -q
0 6 * * * /bin/sh /home/find_quar
0 2 * * * /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/rules_du_jour
parse line, skipping: CONTACT:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[78960] warn: lint: 4 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled for
more information
-----------
Thanks,
Jim Smith
I got the same results. I ran check_whitelist --clean and after lots of
scrolling names and the appearance of cleaning, the file size is the same as
it was to start. Other suggestions to try? Thx.
Jim Smith
> -Original Message-
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
-
If it scores over 7 it goes to my spam folder which I automatically rotate
out every few days. Between my normal rating of 4 and 10, goes to a
"maybespam" folder that I glance at every few days. Everything else (below
the threshold) goes to my inbox. HTH.
I'll need to adjust everyone's email limits upward. I don't want
to remove it as it is an effective tool. Suggestions?
Thanks,
Jim Smith
massassin/user_prefs. I have around 50 whitelisted entries in
the user_prefs file and have the AWL enabled.
Jim Smith
e to narrow the error down to those two rules.
I'm not familiar with BZ but let me know if my info can help out.
Regards,
Jim Smith
> -Original Message-
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 8:40 PM
> To: users@spamassassin
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 8:29 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: user_prefs rules throwing errors
>
> From: "Jim Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >I have narrowed down a couple of rules in my user_prefs
> file
s about my
patents
#
When I comment them both out, the error goes away. Is there a syntax error
that I'm not aware of with these? I used them successfully with older
versions of SA but I'm at version 3.1.0 and am getting the error message and
it is killing SA from completion.
Jim Smith
cored very
low regardless of the high level of porn in it (I kicked it up a few notches
to make it more obvious). Or is my SA scores for tagging porn messages just
not functioning correctly?
Thanks,
Jim Smith
> -Original Message-
> From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PR
se but gave up. That
obviously isn't the case and not the reason I'm having difficulties. Once I
can test select emails by running them back through to compare scores, that
will help.
Thanks,
Jim Smith
> -Original Message-
> From: Stuart Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
A sporadic problem... my favorite . Any
suggestions?
Thanks,
Jim Smith
13 matches
Mail list logo