Yet Another Ninja wrote:
from the descriptions you are using, you are speaking about a totally
different BL... this is not the one "in googlegroups".
ah, my bad. I didn't know that the term 'EmailBL' was used generically.
Jesse
--
Jesse Thompson
Division
the type. Specifically,
you shouldn't use type E (or even B in many cases) for spam detection.
Expect a few FPs even in type A.
Jesse
--
Jesse Thompson
Division of Information Technology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Email/IM: jesse.thomp...@doit.wisc.edu
smime.p7s
Descripti
te: unless otherwise specified, in order for the ADDRESS to
qualify for each TYPE, it must have been intended to
receive the replies.
Jesse
--
Jesse Thompson
Division of Information Technology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Email/IM: jesse.thomp...@doit.wisc.edu
smim
shutting down this type of
account. I don't mind scanning logs for, or blocking mail to, the "old"
addresses. But we do include the date (however accurate it is) so you
can choose to filter the list any way you desire.
Jesse
--
Jesse Thompson
Division of Information Te
Rob McEwen wrote:
Jesse Thompson wrote:
A word of caution. Be very careful how you use the list.
OK. I was wrong. Due to this discussion, I'm convinced that MD5 of the
whole (lower case!) e-mail address is best, with the entire e-mail
address still showing up in plain text in the DN
Jesse
--
Jesse Thompson
Division of Information Technology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Email/IM: jesse.thomp...@doit.wisc.edu
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
