I would start by banning Outlook along with attachments.
Why stop there, ban -all- Microsoft products from the internet.
Next, I would ban smoking, unhealthy foods, and moronic neo-cons.
Come on, this is Earth we are talking about.
The whole point of SpamAssassin is to attempt to make ordinary
SA scans and marks inbound email messages, but does not directly dispose of
them. Typically your mail delivery agent (such as procmail) delivers the mail
to a given destination, based on the headers as modified by SA.
Here's a simple case(procmail rule):
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/dev/null
_
In the default /usr/share/spamassasin/10_misc.cf file, I have
ok_locales all
ok_languagesall
Nothing related in the personalized files in /etc/mail/spamassassin, or
elsewhere.
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:25:45PM -0500, Michael Park
I'm getting connection refused on port 2703 for all the cloudmark.com servers.
Oct 07 10:28:47.241994 check[8774]: [ 3] Unable to connect to
thrill.cloudmark.com:2703; Reason: Connection refused.
Oct 07 10:28:47.264952 check[8774]: [ 3] Unable to connect to
wonder.cloudmark.com:2703; Reason: Conn
I tried a bunch of methods, then plunked down fifty bucks for a 1-year
subscription to an IP -> country database from http://www.ip2location.com
They also have more finely detailed databases for more $$.
They are trivial to use with MySQL or whatever database program you want.
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004,
model.
Any chance in going back to something that actually worked? I tried running a
2.64 version of spamd, but got a mountain of bayes-related errors.
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Justin Mason wrote:
Jerry Glomph Black writes:
spamd 3.0 does preforking of the child processes.
Nothing wrong with that
spamd 3.0 does preforking of the child processes.
Nothing wrong with that, but WHY do the children have such enormous RSS numbers
already when started (>20 Meg per process)? To me, this makes no sense.
3.0 has rendered two decent machines of mine useless by snarfing up all the RAM.
Can this be p
