8.8.
Running your own DNS server seems to be more acceptable to the anti-spam
sites.
.
--
Jeremy
On 6/5/22 6:31 pm, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
For unrelated reasons I had to turn off IPv6 on my incoming mailserver.
Spam plummeted. Like by 80% at least. Both uncaught and caught spam
did.
Were there more hostname variations with records than A records?
--
Jeremy
is still present in messages processed solely by
'internal'. I'm using the package as supplied by debian/armbian. I assume the
3.4.6-1_all deb.
/var/cache/apt/archives/spamassassin_3.4.6-1_all.deb
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on 'internal'
--
Jeremy
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
o limit spammers? Would I get better results if I
greylisted as well as postscreen? Or instead of?
--
Jeremy
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I'd be willing to test it.
--
Jeremy McSpadden | Flux Labs
Local - 850-250-5590x501 | Mobile -
850-890-2543
Fax - 850-254-2955 | Toll Free -
877-699-FLUX
Web - http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/>
On Jan 13, 2016, at 7:12 PM, Marc Perkel
mailto:supp...@junkemai
current version is 1720996
new version is 1720996, skipping channel
1720996 == 1720996
--
Jeremy McSpadden | Flux Labs
Local - 850-250-5590x501 | Mobile -
850-890-2543
Fax - 850-254-2955 | Toll Free -
877-699-FLUX
Web - http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/>
On Jan 4, 2016
Make sure it's running. Check firewall/iptables/selinux
--
Jeremy McSpadden | Flux Labs
Local - 850-250-5590x501 | Mobile -
850-890-2543
Fax - 850-254-2955 | Toll Free -
877-699-FLUX
Web - http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/>
On Jul 29, 2015, at 12:48 PM, jo
dig +trace and see if your ISP is intercepting queries.
--
Jeremy McSpadden | Flux Labs
Local - 850-250-5590x501 | Mobile -
850-890-2543
Fax - 850-254-2955 | Toll Free -
877-699-FLUX
Web - http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/>
On May 12, 2015, at 8:49 PM, Chris
mailto
Use only 127.0.0.1 as your DNS in /etc/resolv.conf ... Nothing else.
--
Jeremy McSpadden | Flux Labs
Local - 850-250-5590x501 | Mobile -
850-890-2543
Fax - 850-254-2955 | Toll Free -
877-699-FLUX
Web - http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/>
On May 2, 2015, at 8:31 PM,
Usually scores are 6 low 10 high. Are you running any RBLs ?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Feb 24, 2015, at 11:35 AM, Yves Goergen
mailto:no
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:05 PM, ricky gutierrez
mailto:xserverli...@gmail.com&g
ums of money
0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Feb 12, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Alex Regan
mail
http://www.mimedefang.org/node/14
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Oct 16, 2014, at 7:32 AM, Carlo Filippetto
mailto:carlo.filippe...@gmail.com&g
Do not have enough HAM to kick on bayes.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Aug 20, 2014, at 10:36 AM, "redtailjason"
mailto:ja...@redta
, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Jul 23, 2014, at 12:55 PM, "Asai"
mailto:a...@globa
Would need more info than this; rather vague. If your receiving the same email
daily it's more than likely been trained as HAM, but marked as spam through TB.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590
Then I think we can all agree that just extending the timeout is not a fix. You
have network issues that should be resolved.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 8
Have you considered running your own DNS server locally ?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Jul 15, 2014, at 3:47 PM, "Quanah Gibson-Mount&q
What does a debug output show ? On both .. Pastebin
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Jul 11, 2014, at 4:34 PM, "Quanah Gibson-Mount&q
pastebin .. and do not edit the message, do not remove headers or email
addresses
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell : 850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
No mention of RBLs or greylisting ...
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Jul 1, 2014, at 2:06 PM, "Steve Bergman"
mailto:sbergma...@g
... A catchall ?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Jun 26, 2014, at 9:24 AM, "motty cruz"
mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Try adding -U to your mailscanner banger/# line.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Jun 24, 2014, at 5:42 PM, "Bruce Sackett"
mailto
Centalt may have it. I'm not sure. 3.4 is still fairly new.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net | Endless Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:01 PM -0700, "Bowie Bailey"
mailto:bowie
You've still left as all wondering what the purpose of that machine is
considering it has no internet access.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x101 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
Check as to why this directory/file doesn't exist or change paths.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x101 | Cell :
850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Jul 14, 2013, at 5:16 PM, "
SQLite is/can-be extremely slow with inserts/updates. It uses a temporary file
for each write operation. It also waits for the OS to complete the
insert/update. … Thats all assuming you can even get it working.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.
shebang line at all; see here where I had to replace the
exclamation mark to get that line to appear:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedSpamdInPostfix
Any chance this could be fixed, or a tip as to how I might get it to work?
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Hi,
I'm told you added me to the Spamassassin wiki contributors list with
username jez. Could you please tell me how I can obtain a password
for login? I don't remember creating a jez account previously.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by "added me". I don't think I
already had an account with username jez so I was expecting to be
send a password too. What should I do?
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 06/01/2013 14:25, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
Kevin added
Kevin added you back on the 31st.
Should be done.
Happy new year,
KAM
On 12/28/2012 7:53 AM, Jeremy Morton wrote:
Hi,
Please add me to the Contributors Group with the wiki username jez.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | Endless Solutions
Cell : 850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
On Jan 6
mprove the documentation when they are willing to do so.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Hi,
Please add me to the Contributors Group with the wiki username jez.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Microsoft handles SPF using the Edge Transport service, in 2010. If it is
configured on the domain.
You are correct with the article, although 2003 is old ...
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590
Topic Last Modified: 2006-04-05
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996295.aspx .. for Exchange 2010
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc | http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/> | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590 x 101 | Cell : 850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955
3:48.083 [742] dbg: pyzor: [745] finished successfully
Jun 15 10:13:48.083 [742] dbg: pyzor: got response: public.pyzor.org:24441
(200, 'OK') 351 0
MailScanner --lint --debug:
pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response
But cannot find the trace
--
Jeremy Mc
Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com
Address: 8.8.8.8
Non-authoritative answer:
Name:40.152.71.64.list.dnswl.org
Address: 127.0.6.3
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 27/05/2012 10:41, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Jeremy,
Sunday, May 27, 2012, 10:28:17 AM, you wrote:
JM>
I don't see what relevance the DNS servers I use on my my machine have
to do with querying dnswl.org - surely dnswl.org shouldn't even know if
I'm using Google's nameservers?
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 27/05/2012 08:53, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Jeremy,
Sa
happening
just after that. Can anyone think of why this might have caused the
problem and how I can fix it?
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 24/05/2012 10:14, Jeremy Morton wrote:
I've gotten a lot of false positives coming into my inbox lately, and
the principle reason for most o
Not sure. I get this:
http://pastebin.com/0U3WrgSS
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 24/05/2012 16:12, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-05-24 17:03, Jeremy Morton skrev:
Nope, but it doesn't actually give an answer section as part of its
output.
where it timeout or rejected ?,
Nope, but it doesn't actually give an answer section as part of its output.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 24/05/2012 16:06, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-05-24 16:41, Jeremy Morton skrev:
I actually get:
Host 40.152.71.64.list.dnswl.org not found: 5(REFUSED)
dig +
On 24/05/2012 15:30, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 05/24, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Normally, I blame a DNS server. See pages like this for more information:
http://www.surbl.org/faqs#dnsproxy
Yup, that could do it. Icky.
Jeremy: You could manually check if you're getting the wron
Where would the rules for these blocklists be, so I can check my rules
files to see whether they're there?
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
On 24/05/2012 11:09, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Jeremy,
Thursday, May 24, 2012, 10:53:33 AM, you wrote:
JM> Interesting that they didn
On 24/05/2012 10:37, corpus.defero wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 10:14 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote:
I've gotten a lot of false positives coming into my inbox lately, and
the principle reason for most of them seems to be that they are matching
the following rule:
-4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED
s. Sounds like something from a Monty Python sketch.
--
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Post what you feel. The ML will help if they can. You can replace IPs and
domains etc.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
On Mar 31, 2012, at 11:19 AM, "joea" wrote:
>>>> On 3/31/2012 at 8:22 AM, Michael Scheidell
> wrote:
>> On 3/31/12 8:04 AM, joea wrote:
>>>
Sa-update should reload SA, therefore reloading rules. What error are you
getting ?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
On Mar 26, 2012, at 9:46 PM, "j...@j4computers.com"
wrote:
> After running sa-update, will restarting spamd load the new rulesets? I see
> references to "spamassas
Leap Year
--
Jeremy McSpadden
On Mar 2, 2012, at 11:11 AM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
> Den 2012-03-02 17:50, Axb skrev:
>> On 03/02/2012 05:36 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>> just a note to whom it might concern :)
>> why no pastebin a sample?
>
> februar
Ha. Nice
--
Jeremy McSpadden
On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:38 AM, "Michael Scheidell"
wrote:
> On 3/2/12 11:36 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> just a note to whom it might concern :)
>>
> phisting?
>
> OUCH.
>
>
> --
> Michael Scheidell, CTO
>
For starters, your using qmail. I know postfix will give you more protection up
front with just rbl and certain restrictions that would help quite a bit.
Are you running any rbl or dns checks with qmail?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
On Feb 19, 2012, at 4:46 PM, "Jason Haar" wrote:
> I
Can you pastebin some sample messages + headers ?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc
http://www.fluxlabs.net <http://www.fluxlabs.net/>
Endless Solutions
Office : 850-588-4626
Cell : 850-890-2543
Fax : 850-254-2955
On 2/18/12 6:55 PM, "neon_overload" wrote:
>
>I
eries therefore banned"
which returns a score that is giving a negative score ... has no justification.
(sorry for the run on sentence)
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc
http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/>
Endless Solutions
Office : 850-588-4626
Cell : 850-890-2543
Fax :
Thank you! I raised this question a few months ago and was in awe that it was
enabled by default. It has caused quite a few issues that i've seen around the
ML. They should return a different value than a negative score. Very bad design.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc
connection refused means your dns servers are not responding properly. Check
your entries in /etc/resolv.conf. The format should be:
nameserver 1.2.3.4
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc
http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/>
Endless Solutions
Office : 850-588-4626
Cell : 8
n 0.1% are affected by this stricter enforcement
...
I have setup bind to do name-caching and no longer doing forwarding. I will
continue to examine longs and monitor the system. Thanks for those who took the
time to reply w/ enough information, rather than smart comments; or vague 1
liners.
--
J
Thanks for the help Benny. .. Anyone besides this guy have anything to say ?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc
http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/>
Endless Solutions
Office : 850-588-4626
Cell : 850-890-2543
Fax : 850-254-2955
On Oct 30, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Benny Pedersen wrot
Yes, that is in place. (not a newbie here)
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc
http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/>
Endless Solutions
Office : 850-588-4626
Cell : 850-890-2543
Fax : 850-254-2955
On Oct 30, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:05:08
Very well. DNSMasq setup and running local, yet still returns HI
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc
http://www.fluxlabs.net<http://www.fluxlabs.net/>
Endless Solutions
Office : 850-588-4626
Cell : 850-890-2543
Fax : 850-254-2955
On Oct 30, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun,
Then why would this rule be enabled by default, or even setup for SA out of the
box. So your telling me that in order to use this rule, i have to setup a local
dns ? i don't think so. I've run SA boxes for years and never had to run a
local dns server.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs
org>.
spamassassin -t -D < MSGID = -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, hightrust [98.126.47.12 listed in
list.dnswl.org<http://list.dnswl.org>]
I am using local dns servers. The server is at SoftLayer's DC. Using their
local DNS servers, 10.0.X
clean; all are. Does not make sense to me.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc
On Oct 30, 2011, at 12:54 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
It seems nightly the rule is re-enabled.
Don't edit the files that are deep in the SpamAssassin working directories,
.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
"Noel Butler" wrote in message
news:1297993593.5473.74.camel@tardis...
/Very Ancient/
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 18:40 +0200, Jeremy Fairbrass wrote:
Hi, I've noticed what seems to be unexpected behaviour with the Freemail
plugin, which I'm hoping someone can shed some
I get the following (bounce back email):
"Delivery Status Notification (Failure)" or "Message Undeliverable!" with
the original email attached which is spam.
PS: I'm using Exim4 with SA-Exim and Spamassassin.
Hope this will help for details.
Thanks for your help in adv
l spoofing for me on my server.
Can anybody explain to me how to do this and how would I be able to test it?
(Apologies if this was discussed in the passed of this list.)
Thanks
Jeremy
Hi Dominic and Users,
I was not using the split configuration of exim4, I'm using the monolithic
config at /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template. So I added this line to my
/etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template config file right at the top "local_scan_path
= /usr/lib/exim4/local_scan/sa-exim.so" restarted exim4
", the output is null. Does this mean I
don't have sa-exim configured properly?
I really appreciate the help guys:-)
Jerry
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Dominic Benson wrote:
> On 18/10/10 16:11, Jeremy Van Rooyen wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the quick reply Dominic,
>
mean I
don't have sa-exim configured properly?
I really appreciate the help guys:-)
Jerry
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Dominic Benson wrote:
> On 18/10/10 16:11, Jeremy Van Rooyen wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the quick reply Dominic,
>
> I just checked and the SApermrej
add a message rule that subject starts with *SPAM* ? Do I
add to my local.cf? I'm sure I did this already.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Dominic Benson wrote:
> On 18/10/10 15:22, Jeremy Van Rooyen wrote:
>
>
> When I look at the rejected emails in the rejected logs f
ne
X-SPF-Guess: neutral
X-Spam-Score: 23.9 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software
So as far a I know, the tagging happens here, but I don't see anything in
the email though.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:46 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010,
Hi all, I need help with my spamassasin configuration.
Setup is as follows: Ubuntu (OS), Exim4 (MTA), Spamassasin (Spam Filter).
When I look at my logs I can see messages been identified as spam, but it
does not get tagged on the email client side. I did look at some forums and
I also made the ne
headers, as shown above. If you know what I mean. However that
still seems like there's a bug or something, because I've never had a
similar problem with any other rules at all, even with emails sent through a
mailing list like this. It's only the FREEMAIL_FROM rule that does this.
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Jeremy
pport, for example by reusing a SURBL or URIBL configuration for DBL. You
risk wrongly flagging legitimate email if you make IP queries to the DBL.
**
Also check out the announcement at
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=655 which goes into further
detail on this new list.
Cheers,
Jeremy
o you want to prevent from happening?
Mail that isn't specifically addressed "To" you not to get to you?
Look at the mail on this list:
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spam with my company domain
From: Jeremy Davila
You realize, that would mean you wouldn'
n Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Jeremy Davila wrote:
> I'm getting Spam which is addressed to another person in my company ,
> but it getting sent to me . So in my inbox the To Field is Kristin , but
> in Jeremy's inbox.
The information in the To: header has nothing to do with who actual
Hi all,
I'm getting Spam which is addressed to another person in my company , but
it getting sent to me . So in my inbox the To Field is Kristin , but in
Jeremy's inbox.
on who the user is, I do not believe this would ever happen due to the
users email usage policies (No mailing lists, no personal email, etc) unless
the email sent was spam anyway.
regards,
Jeremy
achieve this?
Cheers,
Jeremy
Why are you bothering with that? It seems unnecessarily complex.
Here's my amended rule:
/\bwww\s?\W?\s?\w{3,6}\d{2,6}s?\W?\s?(?:c\s?o\s?m|n\s?e\s?t|o\s?r\s?g)\b/i
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Pawe�~B T�~Ycza wrote:
Dnia 2009-06-23,
To reply to myself
I guess that was sent to the spamassassin.apache.org list and the list
was BCC'd so it didn't get put into my list folder. Ah well.
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Jeremy Morton wrote:
I recently got this spam that made its way thru SpamAssas
I recently got this spam that made its way thru SpamAssassin:
http://pastebin.ca/1474274
Looks like it was received from mail.apache.org which is in the
DNSWL.org DB, unsurprisingly. Why would mail.apache.org send out this
obvious spam?
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
ago I had the same
problem and got NO response. Its death actually is good news because it
means not so many innocent people will be able to be listed now.
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Jeremy Morton wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Jeremy Morton wrote:
> My SpamAssassin apparently isn't checking this blocklist; how do I get
> it to?
Another highly-regarded DNSBL that listed that IP is zen.spamhaus.org,
whi
cidentally blacklist your domain. You then have to pay their
tithe money to get people to start receiving your e-mail again. I say
that sucks. BTW, it happened to my domain, I tried to contact them, and
got one automated response e-mail. Nothing more. Good riddance to them.
Best regar
All together now,
3... 2... 1...
WOOHOOO!!!
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
Noted this over at NANAE;
QUOTE:
All,
Please feel free to forward this message to any other location/mailing
list.
It comes with great sadness that I have to announce the imminent
closure
of SORBS. The
John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Jeremy Morton wrote:
My SpamAssassin apparently isn't checking this blocklist; how do I get
it to?
Another highly-regarded DNSBL that listed that IP is zen.spamhaus.org,
which includes the cbl feed. A lot of people trust zen enough to use it
at th
My SpamAssassin apparently isn't checking this blocklist; how do I get
it to?
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, June 21, 2009 12:04, Jeremy Morton wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m3b9629b6
http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=190.244.172.161
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Another one, from Lyris ListManager, subject: "re: your email message"
These damn mailing lists cause ridiculous backscatter. Can't the admins
take a bit more respondibility as to the crap they return to the
so-called 'sender'?
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Jer
s this, rule:
-4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
medium trust
... meaning the mail probably won't get blocked by other factors. What
can I do?
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
to my
scanning, that were mentioned by rich...@buzzhost? Is there a good
reason why a default cPanel install might not include these, like
checking in them takes up significantly more resources?
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Cory Hawkless wrote:
The RBL is a good point, I'm only getti
spam. What do your SpamAssassin
analyses give of this e-mail, and any tips as to how I can get these
marked as spam?
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
34.html
I don't suppose there any rules around to deal with anything like this?
I suppose theoretically you might get a ham e-mail with just an inline
image and not much content... although I can't remember ever having one.
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Mind telling me which DNSBLs you subscribe to and how I subscribe to them?
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Ned Slider wrote:
Jeremy Morton wrote:
... what do you guys get when you put this through your SA install?
http://rafb.net/p/0z7rXo65.html
Mine only gives me a Bayesian spam
higher?
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 18:45 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote:
Here's another e-mail that got through SpamAssassin:
http://rafb.net/p/cFMnIy61.html
Backscatter. These types of arbitrarily phrased "I changed my email
address" auto-responses are pretty muc
Is my Bayesian
filtering screwed up? What score does your SA install give for this
message?
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 09:25 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote:
Another request, please: what score does SpamAssassin give this email for
you?
http://rafb.net/p/FMejnS80.html
Hmm, that looks like a stupid auto-response, likely backscatter.
Subject: Ihre Anfrage an AVM
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 17:26 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
A: Because they are not defined. (See second half of this post.)
Where did you come across that rule at all? How did you get the
impression it should be in your stock install
Yes. All I could find was stuff about creating your own rules, not
actually changing the weightings of existing rules.
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 15.05.09 17:28, Jeremy Morton wrote:
How do I manually override the default scores that SA assigns to
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo