script, I see that a spamassassin --lint command
failed because of these three lines. So I disabled the three lines
for now, as having current rules_du_jour rules makes a lot less spam
than having auto_learn activated.
Is there a way that I can turn autolearn on in 3.1.0?
--
Jeff Ramsey
MIS
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 04:17, Michael Parker wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 07:47:35PM +0000, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
> > ssh $SERVER "
> > echo ; echo 'Learning ham...' ; echo ;
> > sa-learn --ham --showdots --mbox $TMPHDIR ;
>
> Ok
>
&g
ham to the ham mbox and spam to the spam mbox via Novell Evolution.
Do I have the sa-learn --forget line correct? Do I need it there at all?
I placed it there because I wanted to make sure that all the junkmail
not getting marked spam was not only being learned as spam, but
unlearned as ham, just in
BAYESIAN filters on if this is the result, so I must be doing
something wrong.
--
Jeff Ramsey
MIS Administrator
Tubafor Mill, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
am getting some spam that is not
being tagged, and when I check out the headers, it has a negative number
because of the AWL rule. IS there anyway that I can alter the AWL list,
ie. sa-learn --forget on the messages that have the AWL rule flagged?
--
Jeff Ramsey
MIS Administrator
Tubafor Mill, Inc.
I have only been running SA 3X for a fw short weeks, I'll just use the
clear flag. Will this also clear the auto whitelist entries as well? How
can I be sure that nobody gets auto whitelisted again? Auto whitelist is
not something that I care to implement here.
--
Jeff Ramsey
MIS Administrator
Tubafor Mill, Inc.
and now I cannot seem to get rid of them. Is there a way
that I can 'unlearn' these messages, or just start SA's learn process
over?
Thanks,
--
Jeff Ramsey
MIS Administrator
Tubafor Mill, Inc.
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 18:22, Dan Nelson wrote:
>
> If there's just one delivery line, it points the finger at something
> happening after sendmail finishes with the message. Do you have any
> procmail rules that might be duplicating messages? Maybe something
> that would match text within the X-
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 15:36, Dan Nelson wrote:
> If you see two, then it's sendmail or the milter's fault. If you see
> one, then it could be a local delivery or procmail rule issue.
I am only seeing one line like this for each message.
(disregard that last 'empty' reply. I hit instead of
. - s
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 15:36, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Nov 11), Jeff Ramsey said:
> > On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 15:26, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > In the last episode (Nov 11), Jeff Ramsey said:
> > > > I am using SA 3.0.1, spamass-milter 0.2.0, and Sendmail
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 14:59, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am using SA 3.0.1, spamass-milter 0.2.0, and Sendmail 8.12.11. Seems
> to work fine. I am using it with the sql tables and everything. There is
> one problem. I am getting a duplicate for about 2/3 of the mail that is
t this is
what is causing the issue.
Jeff Ramsey
MIS Administrator
Tubafor Mill, Inc.
I upgraded to 3.0.1 today, and now my sql custom rules table works
perfectly when there is a rule listed for the user receiving email, and
SA does not test messages at all if there is no database entry for that
user. For example, if I send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it does the
SQL lookup, fin
Does anyone know of a YUM repository with RPMS for version 3?
an I still
use my SQL custom rules score table to alter the scoring for the rules,
which I think would give me the best of both worlds?
Thanks,
Jeff Ramsey
Tubafor Mill, Inc.
Is version 3 really any better at stopping spam that 2.63? I'm running
2.63 and my friend who owns an ISP just upgraded to ver 3, and he
claims that 2.63 stopped more spam.
Thanks,
Jeff Ramsey
Tubafor Mill, Inc.
16 matches
Mail list logo
