Re: AM:BOOST

Jeff Grossman wrote: >I am seeing a test/rule that comes back as "AM:BOOST". I cannot find >this rule in the spamassassin rules. Does anybody know where this >might be coming from? I am also running SaneSecurity rules in ClamAV, >maybe it is in there? > >I am run

AM:BOOST

I am seeing a test/rule that comes back as "AM:BOOST". I cannot find this rule in the spamassassin rules. Does anybody know where this might be coming from? I am also running SaneSecurity rules in ClamAV, maybe it is in there? I am running SpamAssassin and ClamAV thru Amavis. Thanks, Jeff

Re: feed MimeDefanged mail to sa-learn?

Loren Wilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> When my MimeDefang/Spamassassin system tags a message as spam, it adds >> the Spamassassin report as an attachment to the original message. >> >> Can somebody confirm for me that it would be a BAD idea to feed these MD >> modified messages to sa-learn? >

Re: Site-Wide Bayes Question

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jeff Grossman wrote: >> I have just set up a Sendmail server with MIMEDefang and SpamAssassin >> 3.0.1. This machine is a front-end box to my IMAP server. > > I have a similar setup but with Exchange 2000 as the IMAP server. > I've cre

Site-Wide Bayes Question

I have just set up a Sendmail server with MIMEDefang and SpamAssassin 3.0.1. This machine is a front-end box to my IMAP server. I am using a site wide bayes database. I am curious how other people are handling spam and ham with the bayes database. I have set up two accounts on the front-end

Gmane

It looks like this group is once again on Gmane. Jeff -- Jeff Grossman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])