On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 08:53:57PM +0200, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
> Yes. Hence my question about mail hitting URIBL_BLACK on the first run,
> unlike that one example.
>
> The point is, whether *no* mail hits URIBL_BLACK, or at least *some*
> mail does. Do you get any URIBL_BLACK hits at all? Is
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 05:35:52PM +0200, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
> No DNSBLs in the original result... This *may* be due to the BLs
> catching up, and the second run being done later. This specifically
> seems to be the case for Razor (which hit in both run, just differently)
> and likely for U
Hello,
Apologies if this is a FAQ or old news, but I did a bit of searching
yesterday and didn't find an answer to this one.
I'm using SA (3.2.4) site-wide on a FreeBSD-6.3 box in conjunction with
postfix, using procmail as the LDA. I'm using spamd/spamc, so the individual
spamc processes are ru
