Re: SA 3.3.0 depends on Perl 5.10 (FreeBSD Ports)???

2010-03-05 Thread James Smallacombe
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, LuKreme wrote: On 04-Mar-10 21:41, James Smallacombe wrote: I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one from FreeBSD Ports. Really? I just did a update of the port tree and yet $ portversion p5-Mail-SpamAssassin p5-Mail-SpamAssassin

Re: SA 3.3.0 depends on Perl 5.10 (FreeBSD Ports)???

2010-03-05 Thread James Smallacombe
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, RW wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:21:28 -0500 (EST) James Smallacombe wrote: I actually meant spamc's that had no spamd children to talk to. It seems the ports version of SA replaced my original sa-spamd startup script, which raised the max children from (default?) of

Re: SA 3.3.0 depends on Perl 5.10 (FreeBSD Ports)???

2010-03-05 Thread James Smallacombe
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Michael Scheidell wrote: On 3/4/10 11:41 PM, James Smallacombe wrote: I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one from FreeBSD Ports. It seems that at least the Ports version thinks that the latest SA requires perl 5.10.x, rather than 5.8.9

Re: SA 3.3.0 depends on Perl 5.10 (FreeBSD Ports)???

2010-03-05 Thread James Smallacombe
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, RW wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 23:41:38 -0500 (EST) James Smallacombe wrote: Installing from ports automatically installs perl 5.10.1 which causes spamc children to run wild and basically, spamd can't cope with it. I don't need or w

SA 3.3.0 depends on Perl 5.10 (FreeBSD Ports)???

2010-03-04 Thread James Smallacombe
, but SA just keeps looking for 510 and installing it when it doesn't find it. Reading the SA docs, it doesn't seem to require anything later than 5.8.8...can anyone clue me in as to how to tell the ports version of it to use 5.8.9? Or should I just use the source