Matt Kettler wrote on Wednesday, July 27, 2005:
>At 01:55 AM 7/27/2005, James Bucanek wrote:
>>I just upgraded my SA system and installed Razor.
>>
>>I have two e-mail addresses set up for spam and ham reporting. Both are
>>sent to an mbox that is, twice an hour, s
the file as an mbox
and is treating the whole thing as a single message.
And finally, those "uninitialized value" and "Insecure dependency" messages
just look bad.
Can someone confirm this?
What's the correct way to update the Bayes and report spam to Razor using a
spam-reporting mailbox?
TIA,
James
--
James Bucanek <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
; but I can
find no documentation that states that.
TIA,
James
--
James Bucanek <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ut. It installs nicely. (But give it a lot of time for
> some of its tests. My first shot at a CPAN install I thought it
> had died or locked up on a couple tests.)
Does it make that much of a difference over 3.0.2? If so, I might take a shot
at upgrading later this month or next, when I get the time.
--
James Bucanek <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
just start putting in random addresses, possibly
screwing up the entire Pyzor network, when I had no idea what I was doing.
Do you have a link to a step-by-step instructions that explains how to set up
Pyzor? Maybe I'll make Pyzor my project or next weekend.
James
--
James Bucanek <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steven Dickenson wrote on Friday, June 10, 2005:
>James Bucanek wrote:
>> Greetings, As you can see, the Bayes filter has nailed it as spam,
>> but it still only gets a score of 3.6.
>
>Bayes scores are really quite low in SA v3 - 3.0.2. You may want to
>upgrade to 3.0.
rates. SA has been, so far, a bit of a
disappointment and I'm sure it's my fault. :)
--
James Bucanek <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>