Re: sa 3.0.0 - same performance after training

2004-10-06 Thread Insems Citam
gested greps return 0 ham.mbox.2nd -> bayes 00 returns 662, bayes 50 & 90 return 0, bayes 99 returns 188 spam.mbox.2nd -> all three suggested greps return 0, grep BAYES_99 returns 1920 I think something somewhere went very wrong, what am I not doing right? Tnx, Insems > At 03:28

sa 3.0.0 - same performance after training

2004-10-05 Thread Insems Citam
Still no idea what could be wrong, any ideas guys?   - Original Message - From: Insems Citam To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 11:24 AM Subject: sa 3.0.0 - same performance after training Hi!   I recently installed SpamAssassin 3.0.0. What I&#

sa 3.0.0 - same performance after training

2004-10-02 Thread Insems Citam
Hi!   I recently installed SpamAssassin 3.0.0. What I'm trying to do, is having it scan a mixed mailbox, split the mail into two seperate mailboxes (spam.mbox and ham.mbox) and then analyze how successful it was. I do this with: formail -s procmail -m sa.check < mixed.mbox   where sa.check c