ee use_pyzor\t1 on the log)
On 2023-04-30 09:33, Henrik K wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 12:42:43PM +0200, i...@servermx.com wrote:
Hello,
we have installed Spamassassin (debian 11.6) vesion 4.0 from source.
With backend MariaDB 10.5.18-MariaDB-0+deb11u1 - Debian 11.
Spamassassin is
Hello,
we have installed Spamassassin (debian 11.6) vesion 4.0 from source.
With backend MariaDB 10.5.18-MariaDB-0+deb11u1 - Debian 11.
Spamassassin is raising these messages
info: config: not parsing, administrator setting: use_pyzor\t0
info: config: failed to parse line in (sql config) (line
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
Am 08.02.2017 um 11:16 schrieb i...@lauf-forum.at:
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
I also don't understand why I didn't have the problem till some
months ago.
I can't remember that I changed anything on the Mailserver
configuration.
Does anyone have an idea what's going w
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
I also don't understand why I didn't have the problem till some months ago.
I can't remember that I changed anything on the Mailserver configuration.
Does anyone have an idea what's going wrong?
that messages within the server itself are piped through the
spamfi
I seem to be having a hard time writing rules which anchor
a string to the start of the line in the body of a text message.
e.g., suppose I get a lot of phish which contain text (not html)
like this:
Username:..
Password:..
I try what seemed intuitively easy:
body__PHISH1
Hi,
Before I try to roll my own, does anyone have a set of rules or a plugin
designed to detect all these webmail account phishes. You know -- the kind
that pretend to be a webmail administrator who informs the user his/her
webmail account is being upgraded or has exceeded quota or whatever ..
A
Hi
Can someone suggest a rule (or rules) which will count the number of
lines in the body of a mail message? Or alternatively, a rule which
will tell me if a message contains less than N lines in its body?
Suppose, for example, I am looking to penalize messages which contain
a specific url and co
Eloise Carlton writes:
> Thank you for taking the time to report and share this information. We
> have initiated an investigative process on this report and during the
> investigative period we have downgraded the sender's accreditation
> level.
Thank you, Eloise. I greatly appreciate Habeas' re
y. So spamd was never being used, and
wouldn't benefit me if it were.
Conclusion: Don't use spamd.
Thanks for the help
Paul Hilton
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:04, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:57:02PM -0500, Info wrote:
> > Why is spamd running with a h
spamd,
and I currently have SPAMD_ARGS="-d -a -L -D -x -u vscan", and
/etc/init.d/spamd does:
startproc -p /var/run/spamd.pid $SPAMD_BIN $SPAMD_ARGS
Paul Hilton
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 10:01, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> At 09:51 AM 12.7.2004 -0500, Info wrote:
> >Theo,
> >
>
m
not convinced that spamd has ever found it, or that it is ever actually
being used.
If I telnet to port 783 I do get spamd debug messages.
Paul Hilton
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:04, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:57:02PM -0500, Info wrote:
> > Why is spamd runni
Hello
Why is spamd running with a home directory under /tmp ?
I have spamassassin working as a mail filter under Amavis and Postfix
and SuSE.
I am trying to use spamd to speed things up.
I have two problems
1) I don't think that Amavis is actually using spamd
2) Spamd is not configuring correc
I am also having the same issue. Nothing is going to my spam box. I am
trying to setup a sitewide (/etc/procmailrc) configuration with SA,
Postfix, and Procmail. SA and postfix are doing their job but I can't
get procmail to tag mail and send it locally. I have setup postfix using
transport's for
13 matches
Mail list logo
