, don’t adjust your spam score, but do adjust
your strategy when discovering spam. Reports of spam from .ac.uk or .sch.uk
accounts are likely to be taken seriously, and contacts should be relatively
easy to discover.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
> On 16 Dec 2015, at 16:09, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 16.12.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Ian Eiloart:
>>
>>> On 16 Dec 2015, at 15:30, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>>>
>>> Downgrade tour netdns. There were changes in 1.03 that are fixed in trunk.
&
> On 16 Dec 2015, at 15:30, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> Downgrade tour netdns. There were changes in 1.03 that are fixed in trunk.
> Regards,
> KAM
Downgrade? I upgraded to 1.04: does that not fix the problem?
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
:59.196 [4218] dbg: dns: hit 20
alt1.aspmx.l.google.com.
Dec 16 14:34:59.197 [4218] dbg: dns: hit 30
alt2.aspmx.l.google.com.
Dec 16 14:34:59.198 [4218] dbg: dns: hit 40
aspmx2.googlemail.com.
The problem isn’t with my system resolvers, which all return the right results.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
r server
that is selective and smart about what it learns.
You could do a fake reject, post-data, and pass the spam to your learning
engine. Don't forget that you MUST also pass it some ham.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
x3148
me__"
isn't numeric in addition (+) at
/opt/local/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Net/LDAP.pm line 406,
line 2.\n
Just a guess, but isn't the UID the number associated with the
username rather than the username? EG root UID=0
Not in an LDAP lookup.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
name__" isn't
numeric in addition (+) at
/opt/local/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Net/LDAP.pm line 406,
line 2.\n
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
at copies of emails are sent to you (and maybe the application
owner), perhaps stripped of the body, or at least notifications. That way,
you can get early alerts of abuse. You might want to rate-limit the sending
of email.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
pamhaus.org
list.dsbl.org
rbl-plus.mail-abuse.ja.net
relays.ordb.org
In that order, and get just a few emails a day that get as far as the last
check, with tens of thousands rejected by the earlier tests.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
benefit to doing so, as it's harder to phish if the banks'
customers are expecting email from controlled TLDs.
It's unfortunate that there isn't a TLD for registered financial
institutions, but actually that would be quite hard to define given that
there are widely di
--On 4 December 2006 12:00:32 + Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On 1 December 2006 20:42:06 -0600 Dave Pooser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I can't find a spamd.sh anywhere...
SA is not included by default until 10.4. If you installed it yourself,
you may
ch.
I guess the work around would be to remove the DIGEST_MULTIPLE test, or to
fix my syslog config to not log these errors.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
12 matches
Mail list logo