> The theory is probably that they can pump spam through faster if
> they utilize all an ISP's inbound MX machines :)
The theory is that most ISP don't run spam filters on their secondary
MX's because "all" smtp clients will hit the primary first and that
"always" works. The secondaries are only
Hello Dan,
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 8:13:17 PM, you wrote:
> I'm running on a Celeron 1.8G with only 256M of ram. 2,000 emails/day.
> Average elapsed time for SA scans: 2,988.43 ms. (Max: 94 seconds. Second
> highest: 21 seconds) I'd say you've got something wrong.
Since there aren't so many em
Hello,
Ok, I admit, mine is not the fastest mail server on the planet but is
this the best performance I'm going to get:
spamd[3164]: identified spam (22.0/5.0) for p3scan:150 in 135.4 seconds, 3920
bytes.
That's 2 minutes and 15+ seconds for an email little over 3k in
size...
I run a small pe
Hello all,
I'm new to the list (and new to SpamAssassin as well), so hello to you
all!
I was wondering if I'm going to need a full install of Perl on the
machine I would like to run SA on? Perl is a bit big and I don't
like the idea of having a full set of Perl on my mailserver.
Is there a list
