On Nov 11 at 20:31, Matt Kettler spoke:
> Besides adjusting your administrator with a clue-by-four, you can run it
> through spamassassin --remove-markup
Well I can't use perl on this site.
I'm trying to pipe it throgh `reformime -s 1.2 -e | formail -b`.
This only affects the date in the envel
On Nov 15 at 22:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke:
> >> This were perfect if it were not unsafe.
> >> Doesn't ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs require allow_user_rules=1 ?
> >> It is not recommended. Is there a way to make allow_user_rules safe?
> >>
> >> -Hanspeter
> >>
> Hi,
>
> they will be safe if
>
On Nov 15 at 14:27, Dan Barker spoke:
> Don't remember if you need to do this by user or not. But, if you put the
> zeros in local.cf, it will do the same thing, but for everybody.
local.cf is probably not located in ~/.spamassassin, is it?
But I was told SA is running on a separate box anyway.
On Nov 15 at 16:57, Martin spoke:
> You could zero out the rules u don't wish to use, so they wont trigger
> further false positives, in your .spamassassin/user_prefs file assuming you
> have one in your home directory.
This were perfect if it were not unsafe.
Doesn't ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
On Nov 15 at 08:38, Matt Kettler spoke:
> If you took away the 15 FVGT_TRIPWIRE_* hits the score of the message would
> have gone down by about 10.5 points.
I'm trying to advise the admin. But I don't know his plans...
> Find the duplicates and remove them. My guess is the server has both
>
On Nov 14 at 21:28, Matt Kettler spoke:
> Defintiely custom.
>
> FVGT_TRIPWIRE_* are add-on rules, and are not a part of the standard SA set.
> TW_* are also add-on rules. In fact, I suspect they are a duplicate of the
> same ruleset, but with different names.
> LOCAL_OBFU generic is a local c
Hello,
I have attached a message that has got 9.9 points.
Is this score assinged by the default or by a custom configuration?
-Hanspeter
- Forwarded message from Drew Tomlinson <> -
From: Drew Tomlinson <>
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: SPAM(9.9) shutdown -r Hangs After Upgra
On Nov 11 at 20:31, Matt Kettler spoke:
> At 05:50 PM 11/11/2004, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> >my admin has a very sensitive setup of Spamassassin which results in
> >frequent false positives. Thus the subject is modified but worse the
> >body is assembled of different attachme
On Nov 11 at 17:09, Gary W. Smith spoke:
> Find a better admin.
Well, that's not my first choice.
> If you're getting a lot of false positives then the admin is more than
> likely doing something wrong. We get very few FP/FN on our side even
> with the older SA.
Maybe. He probably tries to
Hello,
my admin has a very sensitive setup of Spamassassin which results in
frequent false positives. Thus the subject is modified but worse the
body is assembled of different attachments.
How can I despamassassin a modified message and turn it into the
original message?
-Hanspeter
10 matches
Mail list logo
