Thanks Kevin
Both of my installations had stopped updating since 11th September due
to this. Now the updates are working again.
From this:
11th Sep
20:00:26.57 Performing Spamassassin Update check...
Update available for channel updates.spamassassin.org: 1840397 -> 1840441
http: (lwp) GET h
I receive emails containing these emojis in subjects regularly. I often found
them annoying and common in spam and wondered about catching then just as the
original poster requested. But then I looked further and see them often used
in genuine emails also. Famously twitter uses these emojis as
https://github.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/issues/115
(Fyi Your question put to the hmailserver forum would have answered this for
you.)
On 27 July 2018 10:08:22 BST, Admin wrote:
>OK. That explains why I've seen it that way in some examples online.
>I'm running hmailserver. Thanks.
>
>___
use an os different to theirs and ask for help).
Do not pursue this particular question on here.
On 18 February 2018 16:23:22 GMT+00:00, Gianluca Furnarotto
wrote:
>Thanks Groach, and all guys that answered to me. This was very helpful.
>Next step for me is using Mysql to store learnin
Gianluca
1, Your .PRE files are (by default) in:
%ProgramFiles(x86)%\JAM Software\SpamAssassin for Windows\etc\spamassassin
You will find the 'AutoLearnThreshold' plugin you need in v310.pre.
You will find the BAYES and SHORTCIRCUIT plugins you need in v320.pre
(they may already be enabled -
, it seems I can talk sh1t too).
Helpful responses only please, team.
On 15 February 2018 22:22:01 GMT+00:00, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>nobody seriously cares ablut windows if it comes to servers - it's that
>
>easy - period
>
>Am 15.02.2018 um 23:17 schrieb Groach:
>> I
I originally guided Gianluca you this list for help because as a user i know
that the jam port of spamassassin makes an almost identical function of the
software which, as you know, operates mainly on these plug ins. Everything you
do in Linux you also do in the Windows version. I also know tha
On 12/02/2018 06:54, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
A "standard" "obsoleted" by a "proposed standard" or a "draft
standard" is nonsense. A standard is obsoleted by a new standard, not
a draft or a proposal. RFC 821-822 are still the standard, until their
obsoleting drafts and proposals become the new
Noted. In fact, after looking through it in the short term I personally
have opted to just take the MAILSPLOIT rules section. Should be pretty
static I think.
On 13/12/2017 22:24, sha...@shanew.net wrote:
Note that after enabling KAM.cf, you'll want to watch more closely for
false positive
On 13/12/2017 21:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.12.2017 um 21:59 schrieb Groach:
Is there any suggestions on a rule or procedure to implement that will
help defend against the MAILSPLOIT type of spoofing?
Seehttps://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users&m=151265708616825&w=2 and
foll
On 13/12/2017 20:48, Antony Stone wrote:
On Wednesday 13 December 2017 at 21:41:04, Groach wrote:
Is there any suggestions on a rule or procedure to implement that will
help defend against the MAILSPLOIT type of spoofing?
See https://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users&m=151265708616825&
Is there any suggestions on a rule or procedure to implement that will
help defend against the MAILSPLOIT type of spoofing?
Full details of it here: https://www.mailsploit.com/index
I was thinking if there is a way to have a rule that checks for encoding
in the FROM header. OR better, maybe i
Im concerned they have done it deliberately to harvest email addresses.
On 21/10/2017 19:20, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/21/2017 11:57 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
It would be a good idea to figure out what subscribed address is
causing these and unsubscribe that address (and ban it) from the list.
Subject: Activate your account at Freshdesk Support Portal
Hello Groach,
A new account has been created for you in our Freshdesk Support Portal.
To get started with using our Support Portal, you will have to activate
your account.
Activation lets you participate in our Forums, browse our Know
Here you go:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=what+is+esq+after+a+lawyer%27s+name
On 20 October 2017 18:44:15 BST, Antony Stone
wrote:
>On Friday 20 October 2017 at 19:29:31, Anne P. Mitchell Esq. wrote:
>
>> Anne P. Mitchell,
>> Attorney at Law
>
>I'm intrigued as to what the "Esq." in your
Usually Esquire a title used in American Law.
(I'm sure Google has more details.)
On 20 October 2017 18:44:15 BST, Antony Stone
wrote:
>On Friday 20 October 2017 at 19:29:31, Anne P. Mitchell Esq. wrote:
>
>> Anne P. Mitchell,
>> Attorney at Law
>
>I'm intrigued as to what the "Esq." in your F
On 26/09/2017 20:08, David Jones wrote:
There is the possibility that Hotmail doesn't like our IP address
because it is a consumer/ADSL/end-user IP - although I've removed it
from the Spamhaus PBL database. I guess Hotmail must be using an
internal database
I would put money on this being th
For info: http://nolisting.org/
On 05/03/2017 14:41, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Oops, seems I mistook nolisting with other MX-related anti-spam technique
postscreen (and many others) uses.
On 05/03/2017 14:15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
does the mx0 has highest preference (lowest priority)?
If not, there's little point in using it - nolisting is supposed to catch
spambots trying to connect to your backup MXes, not to primaries.
No its not. Nolisting is to catch spambots tha
Its called "NOLISTING" - but does it work?
An experiment was carried out on a small throughput server. Here is the
conclusion: https://www.hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=185262#p185262
(You'll be surprised).
On 05/03/2017 06:32, Rob Gunther wrote:
We have run our servers with a decoy
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png
Come on chaps and chapesses. Nothing is going to be concluded between
you too. And having the last word doesnt make one better than the
others (and it still doesnt make you right).
Just agree that neither of you is going to convince the other or l
I have just done a test and do not get the same results as you. My
yahoo incoming emails pass ok:
Return-Path: stopspammin...@yahoo.net
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mailserver
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,
On 20/09/2016 20:31, RW wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:56:47 +0100
Groach wrote:
This Spamassassin plugin will allow you to block by country.
Create the 'nerd.cf' file containing the code, put it in your
spamassasin ETC directory, and uncomment the countries you wish to
block. Fu
exclude Spammer Countries e.g. China,
Thaiwan, India, etc...
On 20/09/2016 18:56, Groach wrote:
This Spamassassin plugin will allow you to block by country.
Create the 'nerd.cf' file containing the code, put it in your
spamassasin ETC directory, and uncomment the countries you wish
This Spamassassin plugin will allow you to block by country.
Create the 'nerd.cf' file containing the code, put it in your
spamassasin ETC directory, and uncomment the countries you wish to
block. Full details in the post.
https://www.hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=29992&p=187520#p
On 31/08/2016 10:32, Axb wrote:
I get no errors with spamassassin --lint
Nor me. All ok.
On 19/08/2016 11:58, Axb wrote:
Question:
Does it also support adding 3rd party (native Perl) plugins?
or are you tied to the precomplied collection delivered by JAM?
Jams product runs with Perl - so any perl plugins provided for
Spamassassin should work on the windows versions too. FYI: i
FYI
I and many others use Jam's windows port of Spamassassin. It is exactly
the same as the linux version in what it can and cant do. Users can
modify with plugins, rules, scoring overrides etc just the same as you
do on linux. Spamd, spamc, spamassassin... all the same. The only
thing th
wong fook loong wrote:
hi all
is there anyway to disable check the X-Originating-IP in
spamassassin ?
Why do you want to do that?
Looks like someone just trying to have a cheeky joke and broadcasting a
naughty name to me. (An old joke. Is he really that good as a lover?)
Jul 9, 2016, at 07:52 AM, Groach wrote:
Our accountants are actually using '.account' TLD and they are a very reputable
business. A surprise when they changed to it, maybe, but change to it they did.
My stats provide all the 'evidence' I need. So far, it seems I'm no
Our accountants are actually using '.account' TLD and they are a very reputable
business. A surprise when they changed to it, maybe, but change to it they did.
On 9 July 2016 16:32:51 CEST, jaso...@mail-central.com wrote:
>
>
>On Sat, Jul 9, 2016, at 07:14 AM, Chip M. wrote:
>> Thanks for all the
On 03/07/2016 23:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
sorry, but when i see Benny after 5 years experience on several lists
i just have enough, mouth wide often but technical still a noob
http://geekologie.com/2011/08/08/mad-on-the-internet-cut.jpg
On 03/07/2016 22:43, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
whitelist_from *@pm.sprintpcs.com
does not work.. Why?
It's because the mail has a Resent-From which overrides any other from type
header.
From the documentation Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
"The headers checked for whitelist addresses are as follow
On 01/07/2016 09:56, Axb wrote:
I then informed him that SA alreadyhas a URL_SHORTENER checking rule
found
in 72_ACTIVE.CF. I was currently using this as a META rule thus:
meta MY_URI_URLSHORT __URL_SHORTENER # defined in 72_active.cf
ATM it seems there is no such rule - pls verify t
On 28/06/2016 16:13, David Jones wrote:
David Jones wrote on 29/06/16 12:46 AM:
No, technology can help. The IT department sets up the mail client
that the CEO uses when out of the office so that it sends mail using
the company mail server with SSL/TLS and user authentication. Or it
uses the com
On 15/06/2016 22:42, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
That's (more or less) "Quoted Printable" encoding.
AFAIK, SpamAssassin "body" rules are applied after the
Content-Transfer-Encoding: has been decoded. So the QP equal signs
are a red herring
On 15/06/2016 22:42, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
That's (more or less) "Quoted Printable" encoding.
AFAIK, SpamAssassin "body" rules are applied after the
Content-Transfer-Encoding: has been decoded. So the QP equal signs
are a red herring
On 12/06/2016 21:14, Bill Cole wrote:
but can you explain why the world needs yet another new mail server
implementation?
As an example of why I ask this, consider that Microsoft rewrote the
SMTP implementation in Exchange 2013 and did it wrong,
A question and answer all in one. I like it.
On 12/06/2016 21:14, Bill Cole wrote:
I was not at all confused, but sometimes when people are Wrong On The
Internet in special ways I cannot resist the urge to respond with a
paraphrased geek meme...
Look up Jamie Zawinski's famous "2 problems" quote regarding regular
expressions. It is a
On 11/06/2016 05:09, Bill Cole wrote:
So, you thought validating email addresses was a problem demanding a
solution? And you "solved" it with a regular expression?
Congratulations on now having 2 problems. They should be very happy
together.
The regex I quoted was out of context to the probl
40 matches
Mail list logo
