I keep getting these Via*/Cial*/Val* "and many other" SPAMs (you know
the ones,
they start with "Hello, Welcome to " and have all
those
obfuscating "DISPLAY:" "none"s embedded in them).
(I'm still using 2.63 on my production mail server, btw. Please don't
shoot
me.)
What I don't understand
I just upgraded my Testbed SA installation (on a Solaris 8 system with
Perl 5.8.5) from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 and am having problems that didn't
exist in 3.0.1. Running "spamassassin -D --lint < /dev/null" reveals:
testbed:1:50 [/] # spamassassin -D --lint < /dev/null
debug: SpamAssassin version 3.0.2
de
On Nov 24, 2004, at 10:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:26 PM 11/24/2004, Greg Earle wrote:
mipl:1:46 [/tmp] # spamassassin -D < SunTrust_spam |& egrep -i
received\|records\|Relays
debug: received-header: parsed as [ ip=137.78.38.32
rdns=mipl.jpl.nasa.gov
helo=mipl.jpl.nasa
On Nov 23, 2004, at 5:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:43 PM 11/23/2004, Greg Earle wrote:
Neither mailserver is NAT'ed. What could I have misconfigured?
Not sure.. dump a message through spamassassin -D and see how it's
handling your Received: headers
Lines like these are rele
On Nov 23, 2004, at 1:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Earle wrote:
2 identical Phishing scams came in yesterday:
...
My 2.63 production machine scored them at 11.5:
...
I'm sure the "ALL_TRUSTED" isn't helping any, but that doesn't
completely explain the 6.2 drop in
2 identical Phishing scams came in yesterday:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:SunTrust Bank INFORMS YOU
Date: November 22, 2004 10:04:25 PM PST
My 2.63 production machine scored them at 11.5:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on my.do.main
> Well I seem to have a problem getting Spamassassin 3.0.1 to compile.
> I am running Solaris 2.5.1 with Perl 5.8.5 and gcc 3.3.2. I have been
> able to install all the required perl modules. Now I want to finally
> install Spamassassin and I get this error:
>
> [...]
>
> gcc -g -O2 spamc/spamc.
On Nov 9, 2004, at 8:39 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Yes, SURBL IS included by default with 3.0. The "copy a file" bit has
only to do with the SURBL implementation for 2.6x (Mail::SpamCopURI).
3.0 comes with it, installed by default, enabled by default.
However, if you don't have Net::DNS, SURBL, nor
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 11:18 AM 11/9/2004, Greg Earle wrote:
I don't believe this is the case. I just upgraded from 2.63 via CPAN on
Solaris 9, and this is what I get:
solaris9box:1:52 [/] # spamassassin -D --lint < /dev/null |& grep -i sur
solaris9box:1:53 [/] #
No mention of SURB
Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 9:33:47 PM, Anton Krall wrote:
So SURBL will work even if no .cf files are on any of the site rules or
config dirs yet? How does SA know about URLs and where to check?
I see some files under cpan dirs and SA that show some rules ab
10 matches
Mail list logo
