> -Original Message-
> From: tomliuwhite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:47 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: my email box is getting bombarded with spam
>
>
>
> I have SpamAssassin in my cpanel. I can edit it by
> cpanel->mail->SpamAssassin. Rece
-Original Message-
From: Justin Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 9:07 PM
To: Greg Allen
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Postfix content filter/milter
Thanks Greg! That was by far the easiest solution, although I'm looking into
clam-av and am
-Original Message-
From: Justin Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 10:02 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Postfix content filter/milter
Are there any postfix users out there who can recommend a way to delete mail
based on spamassassin results? Specifi
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 11:24 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: was: detect active config, now: Start it Up
>
>
> all- i read the theory of operation on the wiki for
> spamd. Still wondering...
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Dawber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 10:12 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: SpammAssassin on WHM/Cpanel
>
>
> I have a reseller shared hosting account under WHM/Cpanel software. (In
> other words I’m not a systems
>
> I hope this helps somebody else from making the same mistake.
>
> Brian
>
I looked all over the Internet about 5 years ago for the best anti-spam
software. I wanted it to be Windows-based easy to use, etc.
Well, I found the best anti-spam software and it turned out to be
SpamAssassin. It wa
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob McEwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 6:16 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: The Future of Email is SQL
>
>
>
> >>MS Exchange... one big Database
>
> Exactly...
>
> And that is one reason why I wouldn't touch th
-Original Message-
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 4:19 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: The Future of Email is SQL
Thoughts . ?
-
MS Exchange... one big Database
You can use Exmerge to do
> -Original Message-
> From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 12:33 PM
> To: Greg Allen
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache. Org
> Subject: RE: is there a way to block email coming from
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Greg Allen wr
>
> However, the ISP dynamic address tests *do* belong in the MTA RBL
> checks. The fraction of legitimate emails received from dynamic-IP
> hosts is vanishingly small compared to the tens or hundreds of
> thousands of compromised Windows boxen spewing spam and viruses...
>
Sorry to poke in on th
You say the problem is 30 min to 2 hours. But you have been working on it
for how long and not fixed it?
You are probably over-simplifying the issue (maybe, maybe not). When you
quote a job you have to plan for worse case. Dealing with vendors, dns
issues, propagation issues, looking at the entire
Well, we already know you don't consider $1,000 for onsite service and a
money back guarantee reasonable.
;-)
> I would much rather fine someone to hire at a reasonable cost to
> come in and
> fix the errors that are making SA detect our own emails as SPAM.
>
> Wayne
> --
> View this message in
The format is correct, although I use IP address myself.
So, I would do like this.
aol.com smtp:192.168.5.3
You must also specify AOL as a domain you accept in the 'relay_domains'
(main.cf file)
You must also add the following line (or similar) to main.cf
transport_maps =
If you are running postfix at the server, you can use HEADER_CHECKS
HEADER_CHECKS runs *after* Spamassassin, so it can detect spam points added
by SA in the header.
So, lets say you wanted to redirect anything with 15 points or more to a
certain email address... you could do it with HEADER_CHECKS
You will probably get more ideas from posters, but here is my thought.
Are you running spamassassin -D --lint as the user that SA runs under when
it is running live?
For instance, I call SA with the user "filter", not the user "root".
So, to properly test SA I have to first type: su filter
This
I know some people use the public folder drag-drop for learning spam, but I
personally don't like the whole idea. And I did consider it.
I would rather work smarter on the server end to kill or mark the spam
before it gets to the user.
I don't think users should have to worry about all the techni
Try to keep refreshing the download page to get a different download mirror
site. You will eventually find one that has it.
> Mmh, not available: The requested URL
> /spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.1.tar.gz was not found
> on this server.
>
> What`s wrong?
>
I installed the new 3.1.1 release from 3.0.4 this evening.
No unusual problems noticed, it appears to be running fine.
I had to install a few new modules from CPAN but 'perl Makefile.PL' told me
which ones, so no problem there.
I also had to comment out a few rules I had created. 3.1.1 did not l
Title: Rejecting emails in procmailrc?
If you
are using Postfix you can do something like this in header_checks
:
/^X-Spam-Level:
\*{20}.*/ REJECT Spam content
rejected.
(Test the
syntax, but I think the above is correct or very very
close.)
header_checks is
run as a Postfi
I noticed you did not say your mailing list was a confirmed opt-in.
If it does not do a confirmed opt-in, you should fix that. Otherwise you
will not stay delisted long. Could get expensive too at $50 a pop.
> On enquiry on why we were blacklisted, it came to light that it was
> blacklisted on
You don't.
Only idiots use AOL. AOL management are idiots, so it is a good match.
One of those idiot users will push the AOL spam button on forwarded spam,
that marks your server as a spam source to AOL admins.
Nothing you can do about that. Once that happens a few times you're done.
Better to
You are already sitting at 4 points here. Why don't you just up the SA score
of either or both of these
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_XBL
Problem solved.
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Baird [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:52 AM
> To: Chris Sante
Using some good RBLs at your MTA should help, also make sure you are running
current version of SA with everything enabled (bayes, urbl, etc)
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:16 PM
> To: SpamAssassin list
> Subject
Using some good RBLs at your MTA should help, also make sure you are running
current version of SA with everything enabled (bayes, urbl, etc)
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:16 PM
> To: SpamAssassin list
> Subject:
SA has a great plugin that will catch most of these, plus viruses.
You would need to install Clamav and this plugin.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ClamAVPlugin
> -Original Message-
> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 7:13 PM
> To:
Your subject should not be temp RBL, you started talking about temp RBL then
changed subjects to your real subject.
Regardless.
You need to configure an invalid recipient filter.
Different email servers have different ways of doing this.
Postfix has a rule too for invalid recipients.
Here is a
>
> Somethings odd here. The above message, when it arrived here from the
> list, did have a real name ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the headers, all
> lines of it except those that refered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or to the
> intermediate handlers of the message. So it looks to me as if he is
> doing it r
If I understand your question correctly, the industry seems to be going this
way...
Postfix has this beautiful rule.
--
reject_unverified_recipient
Reject the request when mail to the RCPT TO address is known to bounce, or
when the recipient address destination is not reachable.
I have recently been working on the Exchange 2000 NDR attack issue.
For those who are not aware of this issue, I will explain.
It seems there is a certain group of desperate idiot spammers that believe
that bouncing off good Exchange 2000 servers with non-delivery reports is a
good way to deliver
I might be getting old, but I don't see any SpamAssassin in the headers of
that message.
Only this line...
X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam)
Do you have email coming in from different servers, maybe not hitting SA?
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Kotowicz [ma
>
> But I'm simply finding that some bellsouth and hotmail SMTP IP
> addresses are
> so "dirty" that they stand out separate from regular non-spammy IPs to the
Hotmail is one of the three largest email providers in the United States, if
not the world. That being Hotmail, Yahoo, AOL. Now, there ha
You will find that not all RBLS are built the same. Most are owned by
individuals who create the RBL to suit their own needs. Those needs may not
be the same as your needs.
If you want to be safe with rejections on your front end before it hits
SpamAssassin (Postfix front end, etc.), stick with RB
; From: Dan Hollis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 7:40 PM
> To: Greg Allen
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SpamCop listing internal hotmail servers?
>
>
> please take this penis waving offlist. this is spamassassin, not
> my-dick-is-bigger-than-your-dick.
>
>
> >
> > From where I stand, he's right on the mark. Spamcop is run by morons,
>
> To insult other system administrators will not help to build a better
> society.
I only insulted Spamcop admins because they are idiots. Actually, I don't
even really consider it an insult. I consider an insult an u
Spamcop admins are idiots. They have always had issues with allowing major
ISPs such as Hotmail to be listed.
Spamcop users are idiots too. When you have end users pushing the 'this is
spam' button when they get an email that they don't like from their own
friends or family, well... you get Spamco
Sounds like something I just ran into. Procmail only works if an actual
mailbox lives on the server from what I can tell.
So, one of the SA list users recommended I try header_checks in Postfix.
That worked for me. You need to have a newer version of Postfix that
supports header_checks then do so
I
wouldn't worry about it. You can whitelist the real ebay servers with
SA.
Also,
if you want to catch more of the phish messages you can install the Clamav
plugin for SA, it does very good at finding phishies. You have to
also install Clamav, but it is a fairly simple thing to
install.
From: Clay Irving [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 11:48 AM
> To: Greg Allen
> Cc: jdow; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to discard spam mails
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:10:37AM -0400, Greg Allen wrote:
>
> > I tried Proc
han procmail's.
> {^_^}
> - Original Message -
> From: "Greg Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Mailscanner and Amavis-new have way too much overhead IMO. For
> production,
> > I already have to maintain latest SA releases and Postfix
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 5:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to discard spam mails
>
>
> Greg Allen wrote:
> > I have a motive for my madness. I installed the Clamav plugin
> for postfix
>
> What version of Postfix are you using?
I am using the latest version 2.2 of Postfix
> What method of integration are
> you using for SA and Clamav?
SA is called similar to this.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedSpamdInPostfix
Clamav is called like this.
http://wiki.apache.org/sp
I have a motive for my madness. I installed the Clamav plugin for postfix
and it works great. Only problem with it is that it can not dump viruses,
it only tags them with a score. So, I want to tell SA to score any message
tagged by Clamav for a score of 100 (or whatever) Then, when I dump high
sco
.
>
> There are other mail handlers like Amavisd-new which might also have the
> functionality you want.
>
> Pierre Thomson
> BIC
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 3:07 PM
> To: Forrest Ald
I find this one issue just about the most annoying 'non-feature' of SA. I
have a site-wide config (procmail does not work sitewide) and I don't want
the overhead and problems of a huge milter program laying in front of SA
just to block any email over 15 stars. I like to keep it simple stupid.
I am
Your example (220.191.29.240) shows to still be sending from a China IP
however, so they have been consistent about sending from China. So... if you
don't need China... (ut oh, I might get called a nazi again for this
message, ;-) )
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[E
Their china, Russia and Korea RBLs are still working for me. I can't tell
you if they work 100% or not but they are on every single Geocities spam,
and I see them on other spams as well... so, I don't know about timeouts on
the RBLs, whether that is truth or fiction. Yes, their website is up and
do
This question is getting asked over and over, it's probably about time to
start referring to the archives to not annoy the list users.
But, one more time...Here is another rule that will help catch the Geocities
spam. (reposted twice now)
Here is an RBL test for china IP addresses that connect to
First thing I do whenever do an upgrade of SA is to go through and zero
out any rules that suppose someone is a good player. I don't believe in
someone being able to pay to send my system spam. Any such whitelist
systems will eventually be abused IMO. Spammers look at SA rules and take
the easiest
I don't have a problem with SA whitelisting the TSA or any other government
agency.
The only thing that I would need before whitelisting is for each agency to
post a video on their website of all senior management removing their shoes,
their clothes, pass through a metal detector, submit to a body
Here is another rule that will help. (reposted from about a week ago)
Here is an RBL test for china IP addresses that connect to your server to
pass email. I tested it and it works. I have score of 5 for a while, but you
can change that for anything you want.
Add it to your local.cf if you like it
This is a very, very dangerous road to go down. You would see a lot of
collateral damage by doing a URIBL by IP. A lot of domain hosts these days
use shared IPs. I could host any number of legit websites on one virtual
IP
and I do. I share IPs with any number of other websites at the web
hosting co
I believe this is why services such as Yahoo email started calling it "bulk"
instead of "spam". I also call it bulk to my users for the same reason.
It's much easier to define bulk than it is to define spam. Spam is in the
eye of the beholder as you can even see on this list.
But I must say, some
I went with the RBL method. More than 1 way to skin a spammer. :-)
Anyways, they put themselves into my bayes with the extra points of the
china RBL. Life is good... Now I can back down on the China points some
since my bayes will more likely catch this garbage.
Content preview: myrtis
http
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Wiebeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 4:49 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: When is Bulk "Bulk"
>
>
>
> >>> "Rob McEwen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/09/05 01:36PM:
> > Of course I don't propose any sor
I got an email to my postmaster account one time, at a job I was working,
from a guy in the Philipines who buys and sells domains. Just so happened
a VP at the company loved the domain name and was thrilled to buy it for
something like $150 cheap. I don't mind cold emails as much as cold calls
on m
Here is an RBL test for china IP addresses that connect to your server to
pass email. I tested it and it works. I have score of 5 for a while, but you
can change that for anything you want.
Add it to your local.cf if you like it. You should be able to modify for
other countries, see the country li
lol
I look at it like this.
My users (certain ones) want to be able to receive an odd internet
email/order of lets say...copier parts from someone in China. Now, the odds
are they won't get more than 1 email every 6 months from China. So, they get
pounded with China spam for 6 months hoping for o
Sorry, I misunderstood at first what you had there. You are checking uri...
This is good, but it might be even better to have a check for connecting IP
(or use in conjunction with the uri) since the spammers can auto-flip
websites from UK, to china, Korea, RU, etc within a few seconds. I am not a
, 2005-08-07 at 12:27 -0400, Greg Allen wrote:
> >> They are also using non-Geocities addresses now. Most of the IPs they
> >> use seem to been from China, so you could RBL china at the front end,
> >> if you are allowed to block China that is... (my use
Title: Blocking specific domains
That
would be a Postfix question, not SA.
SA
only tags, it does not block.
Lookup
smtpd_client_restrictions for postfix.
-Original Message-From: Fettke, Dirk
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005
5:48 AMTo: users@spam
?djBK=nNSn7m
---end example---
-Original Message-
From: Rakesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 10:51 AM
To: Michele Neylon
Cc: Raymond Dijkxhoorn; Greg Allen; Kelson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache.
Org
Subject: Re: GeoCities Link-only spam
O
Yea...here is an example. They are getting through here to and I have
everything turned on except dcc and razor. Here is an example. Hopefully
they will use up all their spam IPs and start getting blocked by RBLs. These
type break-throughs usually don't last too long.
-start-
I agree, we definitely need SURBL black lists. They have helped tremendously
against spam! I just feel that it would be chasing one's tail a bit to try
to catch phishing in SURBL.
People who do phishing are going to change their IP address (IP where the
actual target/sucker is sent) frequently. Th
It seems like this would be a hard thing to do by IPs. If you were to use
Clamav and the Spamassassin hook (see wiki for it), you may get better near
real-time phishing protection. That is what I do here any way. I give Clamav
a 100 score. That's my 2 cents anyway.
-Original Message-
Fro
If I am reading this correctly it looks like SA is working perfectly. SA
admins generally don't care much for kids sending email to our servers from
their mom's computers while she is at work... well u get the idea. But I am
guessing your friend already knows that.
-Original Message-
From
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Starting SA with Procmail
Greg Allen wrote:
> [snip]
>
> The only thing that might be unusual about my install is that the server
> does not hold email. I pa
Title: More spam since upgrading
I
filter a fair amount of email with 3.0.4, and very little spam ever gets through
these days. Almost none actually.
Make
sure you have everything working correctly.
run
the command
spamassassin -D --lint
Look
very very carefully in the results for an
I'm giving up on procmail. It is poorly supported and appears to only work
for local delivery (user mailbox must exist on the box) as far as I can
tell. I am using SA as an email gateway, and I just don't think procmail
works that way from the little I can find on the subject. Procmail doesn't
even
I am running SA 3.0.4, and Postfix 2.2 on Redhat 8.0. I am trying to change
the way I start my SA installation in order to be able to filter out high
ranking spam scores.
I am currently sending emails to SA via a filter script similar to what is
described here.
http://advosys.ca/papers/postfix-fi
It is Redhat 8.0 so this may apply. I will check it out.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 5:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: upgrade to SA 3.0.3 - pod2man path issue
- Origina
FYI:
Ok, I just tried upgrading 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 and get the following
--
During install, after I run: perl Makefile.PL
It asks me a few setup questions then I get:
Warning: I could not locate your pod2man program. Please make sure, your
pod2man program is in your PATH before y
I think this is how I have mine setup (it's been a while).
I have an icon pointing to this command.
/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin restart
Check to see if you have the 'spamassassin' file in init.d for use with the
above command.
-Original Message-
From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
I like the new URL black lists in SA so much I gave them all 4 points each
(but do that at your own risk). Bayes is even doing better now as a result
of the better auto-learning with the URL black lists. I also now give Bayes
99 (5) points (all other bayes points are default or less) and no false
p
I read through some of these postings at rhyolite.com. It sounds to me like
DCC should be off in SA by default going forward, or possibly completely
removed from SA future versions so users don't accidentally get in a
license/legal dispute without their knowledge.
For instance...Jump two years int
Some users have had problems with corrupt AWL database after upgrade of
Spamassassin. Try disabling AWL to see if that is your issue.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
, if you post to this list use a throw-away email address unless
you are looking to have a good test account for SA. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Greg Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 11:36 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Sudden spam to this
Does posting to this list open me up to dweebs harvesting email addresses?
I'm suddenly getting BS spams to this email address, and they have to be
coming from one of two sources. This list being one of the options.
Thanks.
My dcc on RedHat 8.0 is located in
/var/dcc directory
You should see DCCIFD there as well.
I had to change a line in the /var/dcc/dcc_conf to
DCCIFD_ENABLE=ON
Also, make sure you install the latest DCC with DCCIFD from the Rayolite
website (if you do not have it).
Put the path to DCC in your
I have a fix for that
score RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED 0
I don't give big negative points to anyone. To each his own though.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 8:29 PM
To: R McGlue
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RCVD_IN
If you still have this, it is not going to work, as I said.
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 7.0
-Original Message-
From: mw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 5:33 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: I
ystem overloading problem
Greg,
How large was auto-whitelist?
I just renamed mine and it was about 85Megs. Ironically, I have a VERY old
one in the same directory that was about the same size.
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[
They work by default but you must have DNS support installed. Find them on
cpan.org
Run spamassassin -D --lint and look for files that need to be installed. If
you have DNS installed it should make calls assign points to spam.
Once you get DNS working, you can also created custom blacklist entrie
This is not good. You should make sure that you upgraded all of the
supporting files including db_file to latest from cpan.org
run spamassassin -D --lint to see what files it uses and upgrade those.
You need to get your db working again it looks like to me.
-->debug: bayes: no dbs present, canno
I had a problem with auto-whitelist. I had errors writing to it when I
tested with spamassassin -D --lint
I went to the auto-whitelist directory
/var/spool/filter/.spamassassin
and renamed the auto-whitelist file to auto-whitelist.old
The system created a new auto-whitelist and so far so good.
You appear to be a 'user'. This is not a 'user' mailing list. It is for
system admins and developer types who install or configure spamassassin on
their servers at a system level. You should be talking with your system
administrator who installed SA rather than abusing this list.
-Original M
user to user post (I am not a developer)
Are you using DCC, Pyzor or any RBLs on the front end or any custom
SpamAssassin RBL rules? Maybe that would help you on these types. Much of
the power of SA is it's ability to check outside sources such as these, so
you don't have to rely 100% on just text
User to user post... ( I am not a developer)
I can see where this my be something to consider 10 or 20 years from now
when we all have supercomputers in our pockets. :-)
But until then...
I would concentrate on implementing the latest Spamassassin 3.0.2
It is a bit of work to get it working cor
esday, March 01, 2005 2:58 AM
To: Greg Allen
Cc: Matt Kettler; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: I don't think the URIDNSBL is working on spams yet
On Monday, February 28, 2005, 11:44:33 PM, Greg Allen wrote:
> OK, just did that. Sent from Yahoo email into my system, no luck. If
Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:37:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Greg Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="0-1741638910-1109662667=:15898"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2
Just did upgrade from SA 2.63 to SA 3.0.2, everything looks good, but I
don't see any evidence that URIDNSBL is doing anything to spam emails so
far.
Here is the output. Is it broke?
Thanks for any help.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] filter]$ spamassassin -D < test.txt
debug: SpamAssassin version 3.0.2
Here you go...
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SubjectRewrite
-Original Message-
From: Tom Q. Citizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 10:53 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Help needed with rewrite_header and Spamassassin 3.0.2 on Linux
Hi!
Doesn't look like spamassassin. I think maybe you should look at your Clamv
virus attachment config http://www.clamav.net/ or call the guy you laid off
who setup the clam av filter. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:36 AM
To:
I got this spam on Sat 2/12/2005. You
sometimes have to admire the work that goes into this non-sense. At first I
thought it was an image. But it is not. Notice the words are made up of very
small text arranged into bigger text which creates words.
---snip-
I am looking at the SA files and have not found any info about this yet.
Does SA 3.0.2 test for a reverse DNS (A record) on a connecting mail server
and assign a point value for servers with no reverse DNS?
Thanks
I downloaded SpamAssassin in tar.gz format from spamassassin.org
I have a working SA version 2.63 that has been running for months. I wish to
do the upgrade to 3.0.2.
I ran rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2.tar.gz
Went to the correct i338 RPM directory
Ran rpm -i (perl file name ) (spamassas
95 matches
Mail list logo
