RE: I am NOT a spammer

Loren Wilton wrote: > Now, I grant IPV6 is a different problem. But this particular case > should be trivially solvable if anyone felt it was worth solving. > > Loren I agree that it wouldn't be a tough problem to solve if it were necessary to do so. But that seems like too much overhead

RE: Gif-Only spams

> Baby steps ;) Agreed!

RE: Gif-Only spams

> Check out the interesting idea at www.rulesemporium.com/forums/ > > entitled: Image attachment MD5 footprint RBL My only comment on a system like this is that it could be easily subverted. A spammer could use automated image editting tools to randomly change some aspect of the file that would

RE: Subscribing to spam lists

> The only way to properly forward a spam is to forward it as an RFC822 > attachment and then unattach it at the receiving end. But I > expect this > is more hassle than you wanted... If you are using Exchange and you set your account to receive the email for that user. Then you should get the e

RE: Testing the new SA version

headers. I am in an Exchange environment and I've been cutting and pasting the headers and body into a text file. Is there a better way out there? Thanks -Original Message- From: Geoff Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 2:26 PM To: Users (E-mail) Subject: Testin

Testing the new SA version

Pardon the newbish question, I am new to my position and SA in general. We have 2 mail relay servers running SA 3.0.2 and a test server that I have upgraded to 3.0.3. I would like a solid testing process where I can run a test of a bunch of Spam emails against the test server (SA 3.0.3) then t

RE: add_header

ing it in the header from one of the servers. -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:00 AM To: Geoff Manning; Users (E-mail) Subject: Re: add_header At 08:48 AM 4/28/2005, Geoff Manning wrote: >The local.cf file is the s

add_header

I have gone ahead and made the change I asked about yesterday and it works perfectly (on one machine only!). We have two mail servers scanning the mail before passing it onto exchange and one of them is adding the headers but the other isn't. I've checked everything I can think of: SpamAssassin v

RE: --Lint parse error with always_add_headers

ttler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 12:06 PM To: Geoff Manning Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: --Lint parse error with always_add_headers Geoff Manning wrote: >When I run spamassassin --lint I receive a parse error as shown belowhow >do I fix i

--Lint parse error with always_add_headers

When I run spamassassin --lint I receive a parse error as shown belowhow do I fix it? It looks like it is the right syntax. # spamassassin --lint config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: always_add_headers 1 lint: 1 issues detected. please rerun with debug enabled for more inform