Re: [OT] Bogus MX opinions

2008-02-19 Thread Francesco Abeni
Bowie Bailey ha scritto: Francesco Abeni wrote: (...) I'd like to implement a "Bogus MX" ... I would say that it is too risky to put a non-smtp host as your primary MX. There are some servers which will have a problem with that setup and either be unable to deliver mail to y

Re: [OT] Bogus MX opinions

2008-02-19 Thread Francesco Abeni
Thomas Raef ha scritto: (...) I'd like to implement a "Bogus MX" for further filtering of SPAM. I don't know if this is the correct name, by "Bogus MX" i mean setting up a low priority MX record which points at a non-smtp server. I'd like to know some first-hand experience about two questions.

Re: How to Know

2008-02-19 Thread Francesco Abeni
Tarak Ranjan ha scritto: Hi List, how do i come to know that each and every incoming & outgoing mail is massing through SA. What about looking at the full headers of the received message? This seems to me the quickest way. This is a little different depending on your mail client, but once yo

[OT] Bogus MX opinions

2008-02-19 Thread Francesco Abeni
mplaints from valid senders? 2. Has it reduced significantly SPAM? I'd like to know if it's worth the (little) trouble of setup and verifying question #1. Thank you for your time. -- Francesco Abeni [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. 328 317 85 48 skype f.abeni

Rules statistics and custom values

2008-02-07 Thread Francesco Abeni
is, does anyone know of a tool that can give me this "rules usage" on a folder of messages? -- Francesco Abeni [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. 328 317 85 48 skype f.abeni