> Thanks,
> Rhett Roy
--
Kind regards,
Eugene Kurmanin
spamd
> child
> The machines are dual xeon 2.4G with 2G of RAM and dual U320 SCSI drives
> in software RAID1. I could feasibly bump the boxes up to 4G, but it
> will get expensive!
> Any suggestions would be appreciated!
> Cheers
> Mike
--
Kind regards,
Eugene Kurmanin
ow much incoming mails do you have per second?
2. How much SA scan the one message at average?
--
Kind regards,
Eugene Kurmanin
> John Andersen wrote:
>> On Wednesday 13 April 2005 09:57 am, Eugene Kurmanin wrote:
>>> 5. Copy SPAM to the defined mailbox;
>>> 6. Reject SPAM at the DATA stage,
>>> if SPAM score is greater than defined value;
>>> 7. Log all activities to syslog
> On Wednesday 13 April 2005 09:57 am, Eugene Kurmanin wrote:
>> 5. Copy SPAM to the defined mailbox;
>> 6. Reject SPAM at the DATA stage,
>> if SPAM score is greater than defined value;
>> 7. Log all activities to syslog.
> Well if you are going to reject,
quality);
4. Very low resources are required;
5. No temporary files are created.
You can get it here:
http://smfs.sourceforge.net/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/smfs/
Feedback are welcome :)
--
Kind regards,
Eugene Kurmanin
welcome :)
--
Kind regards,
Eugene Kurmanin
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> sholdn't matter I suppose) and when all availible spamd children are stuck
> mail isn't flowing as nicely as it used to (lots of spam unchecked).
Kind regards,
Eugene Kurmanin
