Re: Several problems with SA 3.1

ITCODE? Is 67 right? Is #67 causing all the outgoing (and deferred) mail? Should I change it to $? as seen on other examples? Thanks! Eduardo Gimeno Chris Purves dijo: > Eduardo Gimeno wrote: >> >> 2.-SA was classifying mail properly, attending to "^X-Spam-Status: >>

Several problems with SA 3.1

og. I have read about hardware failures (memory/swap/cache...) related to error 11, but I didn't alter any hardware configuration, just compiled some cpan perl modules... Any help? Thanks for your time! Regards. Eduardo Gimeno.