If this topic is deemed inappropriate for this list please disregard and
I will join and post on the amavisd-new list.
I currently have a postfix/amavisd-new setup which I am very happy with
(including postgrey which has been amazing). For any emails that score a
tag or are quarantined, amavis ins
I am using postgrey which allows for whitelisting of address ranges,
specific IPs, etc. I implemented it on the Thanksgiving weekend so it
could build up it's triplet database before hitting the work week email
and I've not had a single person complain. On the flip side, I very
rarely see spam come
> -Original Message-
> From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 2:21 PM
> To: John Rudd
> Cc: Dylan Bouterse; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RelayChecker 0.3 (more overhead?)
>
> John Rudd wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 1:54 PM
> To: Dylan Bouterse; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RelayChecker 0.3 (more overhead?)
>
> Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> >
> >> -O
> -Original Message-
> From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 8:26 PM
> To: SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: RelayChecker 0.3
>
>
> New version of RelayChecker.
>
> http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar
>
> Changes:
>
> - It's no
Title: RE: IncrediMail?
From: Chris Santerre
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006
9:27 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: IncrediMail?
> has
anyone got a good corpus of mail from this mail tool?
> I hear man
In the 80_additional.cf file I have a list of TVD* rules that are not
explained on the http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html page
(I'm running SA 3.1.7 and up to date with sa-update). Are these new
rules added to SA? Most of the scores rank pretty high and I'm seeing
them pop up in FPs mo
I did a couple of times. :(
> -Original Message-
> From: Billy Huddleston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:20 PM
> To: Dylan Bouterse; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Relay Checker Plugin (code review please?)
>
> You may
> -Original Message-
> From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:05 PM
> To: Dylan Bouterse
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Relay Checker Plugin (code review please?)
>
> On Wed, 1 Nov 20
I have a FP that hit both DNS_FROM_RFC_POST and DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE but
when I go to http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/ and lookup the sending mail
server IP it says not found. Am I right in assuming if an email fails
these tests the IP should be listed in the above site?
Dylan
> -Original Message-
> From: Billy Huddleston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:58 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Relay Checker Plugin (code review please?)
>
> Attached is patch to allow scores to be done in the .cf file
>
> --- Relay
-Original Message-
From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 6:23 PM
To: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: Relay Checker Plugin (code review please?)
I've written a plugin for Spam Assassin that does the relay checks I
used to do in MimeDefang. The purpose of
, * Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> I have added some rules in my local.cf file (for adding scores for
some
> SARE rules) but when I run spamassassin -lint (or when I run
> rules_du_jour which does the same) it says the rules in my local.cf
file
> are non-existent, but spamassassin ultimately runs fin
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 9:13 AM
To: Dylan Bouterse
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spamassassin --lint fails with rules in local.cf
Dylan Bouterse wrote:
>
>
> **
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTE
Title: RE: spamassassin --lint fails with rules in local.cf
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:58 AM
To: Dylan Bouterse
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spamassassin --lint fails with rules in local.cf
Title: RE: spamassassin --lint fails with rules in local.cf
From: Chris Santerre
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006
9:31 AM
To: Dylan Bouterse;
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: spamassassin --lint
fails with rules in local.cf
I have added some rules in my local.cf file (for adding scores for some
SARE rules) but when I run spamassassin -lint (or when I run
rules_du_jour which does the same) it says the rules in my local.cf file
are non-existent, but spamassassin ultimately runs fine. What am I doing
wrong?
Dylan
-Original Message-
From: jasonegli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:36 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Per Domain Whitelisting
I'm running multiple domains on one SPAM cleaning server. I'm wondering
if
there's a way in spamassassin to build a se
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:59 PM
To: Dylan Bouterse; list_spamassassin
Subject: sare suggestions.
ylan Bouterse wrote:
> What SARE channels are you subscribing to? I just got the
rules_du_jour
>
Title: Having issue with a type of spam I havn't seen before
I’m trying to write a rule to score
src="" but I can’t seem to get it right. Can somebody shed some
light on what I’d use for the 20_phrases.cf file so I can start scoring
this? Thanks.
Dylan
From: Thomas Lindell
[
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 9:46 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Stock spam in images
Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> I'm a newbie to the list and have been scanning recent posts to see if
> what I
I'm a newbie to the list and have been scanning recent posts to see if
what I'm about to ask about has been covered but I haven't seen anything
yet.
Lately I have been getting more and more of the stock alert spam but now
all the good info is in an image and typically following the image is
random
22 matches
Mail list logo
