On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:18:13PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:02:16PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > > as well as:
> > > 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold'
> > > where they both have the nonspam
x27;
> where they both have the nonspam default documented as 0.1.
That looks like a documentation bug. :-) It'd be great if somebody
reported that to the bugzilla at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/
--
Duncan Findlay
pgp3CrwerU4Uo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
r the future (I'm sure there'll be
> more... ;)
Probably not to me, but it might be useful to others. (I think I
already know what needs to be done.) Also, it might limit creativity
in possible solutions. We need a score ranges mechanism, we don't need
the specific one we
iscusses many of the
issues that differentiate the scoring process from most other machine
learning problems. (Then again, it might just be boring.)
Enjoy!
--
Duncan Findlay
pgp1gS88F0B9z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t; place of weight based scoring. Does this sound like it qualifies?
Perhaps pluginize the scoring mechanisms so we can have plugins that
implement different ham/spam decision rules?
--
Duncan Findlay
pgp45Qcn2sEBR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
and you want to use
these plugins by default without checking them first
Anyways, that's my opinion, though I'm not nearly as familiar with the
update process as Theo is.
--
Duncan Findlay
pgpVvNds3MgMZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:00:06PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 11:10:53PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > I've read most of the e-mails on this topic and I think the underlying
> > problem is that this method relies on knowing exactly whi
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 11:10:53PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> I've read most of the e-mails on this topic and I think the underlying
> problem is that this method relies on knowing exactly which profiles
> (i.e. combinations of rules) valid ham can hit.
After re-reading your mes
'll work in practice.
--
Duncan Findlay
pgp8GwTi2pg2F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
dev list is fine for technical discussion about how SpamAssassin
works. Just make sure you don't start asking questions about how to
use SpamAssassin, or you probably won't get an answer. :-)
--
Duncan Findlay
f us packaging SpamAssassin for
distributions should think about this. :-) Will it be okay if all
Debian users start running sa-update on the same minute of the hour?
--
Duncan Findlay
pgpj4XrsaueQ7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
he
first paragraph when running the rules. All HTML tags and line
breaks will be removed before matching.
--
Duncan Findlay
pgpxzFeoMk5zQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. It is not logical for spamd to call
spamassassin, though as Daryl pointed out it would not be difficult if
you chose to do that. :-)
Anyways... maybe I should get back to doing something useful like
studying for tomorrow's exam...
--
Duncan Findlay
pgp2dd6c1W0uG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
his would mean they wouldn't get a good S/O ratio anyways.
--
Duncan Findlay
pgp56fT3Pm0Sl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:43:58PM -0400, Dan Horne wrote:
> >> 10) Making top ten lists.
> Hilarious. Can I subscribe to those top ten lists with RDJ?
Are they going to be licensed with the Apache license?
/me ducks
--
Duncan Findlay
pgpbI5yKn40MO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.org/pkg-sa/ Patches are also welcome, of course!
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
cause our ice rink caught fire.
Not to mention how your team seems to be doing pretty poorly in the
Olympics... (Tying Latvia?) ;-)
(Sorry, couldn't resist...)
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
y.pdf
Please feel free to forward this message to anyone that may
interested. References are available on request.
Thank you,
Duncan Findlay
[1] More precisely, I'd like to work May, June and the first little
bit of July. I am going to be travelling in Europe for the last half
of the summer, fro
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:20:28PM +0100, Christian Eichert wrote:
> Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:35:23PM +0100, Christian Eichert wrote:
> >
> >>:) ... shoot me! [this was 1 (one) line]greetings Chris :))
> >
> >
> > This racis
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:35:23PM +0100, Christian Eichert wrote:
> :) ... shoot me! [this was 1 (one) line]greetings Chris :))
This racism has no place on the SpamAssassin mailing lists.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.0.3-2/changelog
or /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/changelog.Debian.gz
spamassassin (3.0.3-2) stable-security; urgency=high
* Security release to fix potential DoS caused by large headers
(CAN-2005-1266)
-- Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL P
chance to package 3.1.0
yet. :-( It wouldn't take me long to do it, but I don't have the time
to test it adequately... :-(
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
which is unfortunately a little longer than I'd
like right now. :-(
I hope to get it out soon.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
sentially no rules,
which, not surprisingly, doesn't mark anything as spam.
So, either copy everything into your -C directory, from
/usr/share/spamassassin (or equivalent) and /etc/spamassassin (or
equivalent), or just edit the files in /etc/spamassassin (possibly
/etc/mail/spamassassin inste
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:41:39PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> *** THIS IS A RELEASE CANDIDATE ONLY, NOT THE FINAL 3.1.0 RELEASE ***
>
> SpamAssassin 3.1.0-rc2 is released! SpamAssassin 3.1.0 is a major
> update. SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical
>
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:21:20PM -0700, John Rudd wrote:
>
> On Aug 29, 2005, at 9:29 PM, Duncan Findlay wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:57:31PM -0700, John Rudd wrote:
> >>Does this fix the problem with SIGCHLD?
> >
> >Do you have a bug number? What
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:57:31PM -0700, John Rudd wrote:
> Does this fix the problem with SIGCHLD?
Do you have a bug number? What problem with SIGCHLD are you talking
about?
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nfiguration file using the -F
switch, contributed by John Madden.
- added SPF-based whitelisting.
- Polish rules contributed by Radoslaw Stachowiak.
- many rule changes and additions.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
i contributions too, just as easily; without
the Bugzilla overhead.
So to summarise: to help contribute documentation, either a) Post to
the Wiki, or b) File a bug (preferably with a patch). If we like what
you do, we'll consider giving commit access.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ocumentation.
So, here's the link:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation
Happy editing! We appreciate your help.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
fy as an "anti spam
> accredited system".
Essentially you would need to come up with a system in which sent mail
can be identified as ham with very minimal false positives, and very
minimal potential for abuse. (Hint: this is very difficult) Also, it
has to be palatable for the community. (This i
pre-release on a production server
(obviously). Since the scores haven't been adjusted, you will likely
get FPs or FNs beyond what you would usually expect.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
7;d
probably be lynched if I signed someone's key without checking a
government issued ID. (Hence, why I have signed very few keys.)
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ng this request,
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and
> find out if it works than to find out it doesn't at 5 am after a power
> outage. ;)
Presumably you can test startup scripts without actually
rebooting... rebooting to test a startup script seems so windows-ish.
On debian:
/etc/init.d/foo stop
/etc/init.d/foo start
shoul
es:
>
> # Source spamd configuration.
> if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin ] ; then
> . /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin
> else
> SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -m5 -Hi --user-config"
> fi
Sorry, Mandrake not Debian. Anyways, change options in
/etc/sysconfig/spamassassin, I think.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t the socket being in use.
>
> What am I missing? - John
If you're using Debian, and from the sounds of it, you are, command
line options are set in /etc/default/spamassassin. Try
adding/subtracting options there.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
without it.
If you lower the score to -100, it'll add roughly 50 points assuming
the long term average is roughly 0.
(My recollection of this is a little hazy and I can remember the
mathematical formula, but there doesn't seem to be a problem here.)
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
iply all the scores by a certain factor.
If your current "middle" is 2.0, multiply all scores by 2.5, so your
ham average becomes 2.5 and your spam average becomes 7.5.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
39 matches
Mail list logo
