-Original Message-
From: Kris Deugau [mailto:kdeu...@vianet.ca]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 2:21 PM
To: spamassassin-users
Subject: Re: Large # of Spam getting through all of a sudden.
>*nod* I recently flagged them as a nuisance netblock owner in the
>internal DNSBL[1] here. I've been
On 6/10/2013 2:45 PM, Duncan, Brian M. wrote:
> I rarely have seen any SpamAssasin hits on the bodies of these messages.
>
> (cached, score=-0.125,required 6.5, autolearn=not spam,
> RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.12)
Do you train the Bayes database manually? Or via autolearn only?
Again I think you are preaching to the wrong crowd.
No offense meant.
>
> Please distinguish between filtering spam (a solution that
> keeps spam out of your mailbox) and changing the protocols
> and/or ISP behavior to make spamming more difficult (a
> solution which keeps spam off the wire in
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:49 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Breaking up the Bot army - we need a plan
>
> We can talk about other things but I'll stop here to focus on
> the bot army.
>
I thi
140.211.11.2 listed in bl.spamcop.net (127.0.0.2)
If there are no reports of ongoing objectionable email from this system
it will be delisted automatically in a short time.
Causes of listing
SpamCop users have reported system as a source of spam less than 10
times in the past week
===
I received several variations of the same Spam message overnight.
They all pretty much looked like this:
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=16.149,
required 6.5, BAYES_99 3.50, DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX 2.40,
FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL 2.86,
Title: RE: spam attacks - so and so wrote about a stock
Ahh OK sorry, I figured it was animated gifs
period.
Thanks for clarifying that for me.
From: Chris Santerre
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October
19, 2006 9:46 AMTo: Duncan, Brian M.;
users
; ' ' '' ' ' ''' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' '' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ''
> ' ' '' ' ' ' '
> ' '' ' '' ' '_'
>
Title: RE: spam attacks - so and so wrote about a stock
Sorry Chris I replied directly to you instead of the
list before.
I put in place the new rules yesterday and I am not
getting a hit on animated gifs from the new
addition.
It should be
this part of the new sarstock rules that it hit
send a GIF I created no tmp dirs are left, if I send one of the images
left from one of the dirs from before it leaves it)
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan, Brian M.
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:27 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: tmp files
I just looked and have tmp dirs being created by FuzzyOCR - with what
looks like tmp files in those dirs. No tmp files in the root of /tmp
It looks like certain images are causing FuzzyOCR to quit proccessing
messages in my case based on what I see in these "dead" tmp dirs left
behind. It's onl
11 matches
Mail list logo
