Re: Mark as spam if header does not exist/is missing

2016-01-24 Thread Don deJuan
On 01/24/2016 10:06 AM, Axb wrote: > On 01/24/2016 06:38 PM, Don deJuan wrote: >> header __XEXAMPLE_ABC X-Example ~= /^ABC$/ > > should use =~ and NOT ~= *face palm* ugh has not been my weekend on the small details. Thanks!

Re: Mark as spam if header does not exist/is missing

2016-01-24 Thread Don deJuan
On 01/23/2016 08:38 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, Don deJuan wrote: > >> On 01/23/2016 04:37 PM, John Hardin wrote: >>> >>> The rules will be different if you want to score "the header is >>> present but it does not contain specific text&

Re: Mark as spam if header does not exist/is missing

2016-01-23 Thread Don deJuan
On 01/23/2016 08:38 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, Don deJuan wrote: > >> On 01/23/2016 04:37 PM, John Hardin wrote: >>> >>> The rules will be different if you want to score "the header is >>> present but it does not contain specific text&

Re: Mark as spam if header does not exist/is missing

2016-01-23 Thread Don deJuan
On 01/23/2016 04:37 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, Don deJuan wrote: > >> I am having trouble either finding the right documentation or just >> not understanding. What I am trying to achieve is that if there is >> not a specific header such as X-Example

Mark as spam if header does not exist/is missing

2016-01-23 Thread Don deJuan
I am having trouble either finding the right documentation or just not understanding. What I am trying to achieve is that if there is not a specific header such as X-Example: ABC , it will then get marked as spam. Currently I have been trying header ABC_HEADER exists:X-Example: ABC But I am think