Hello,
Attached you find the output of the sa-learn execution. The nine
spam E-Mails learned are there because I manually learned a mbox
file with spam. As you can see the ham part seems to work.
is there anyone who could help me on this or anyone who has the same
problem?
Or is it better to
Hello,
My problem is: The bayes filter does (auto-)learn ham mails but no
spam mails. In my logs I found spam mails that have a very high score
and should be autolearned. I think my bayes setup is correct, because
ham mails are learned as expected.
Autolearning is based on a different scor
Hello,
Hello,
My problem is: The bayes filter does (auto-)learn ham mails but no
spam mails. In my logs I found spam mails that have a very high score
and should be autolearned. I think my bayes setup is correct, because
ham mails are learned as expected.
Autolearning is based on a different
Hello,
My problem is: The bayes filter does (auto-)learn ham mails but no
spam mails. In my logs I found spam mails that have a very high score
and should be autolearned. I think my bayes setup is correct, because
ham mails are learned as expected.
Autolearning is based on a different score to
Hello
you need to find out how these values are set
* bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -0.001
* bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 9.0
I have set these lines today. Do these differ from the default values?
Dieter
Hello,
I have a new mail setup using Debian Jessie with postfix, amavisd-new,
amavisd-milter and spamassassin. I use the versions from the Jessie
repository. My setup does pre-queue filtering, so Spamassassin does
the checks while the mail is not finally queued. Postfix calls Amavis
through t
Hello,
I have a new mail setup using Debian Jessie with postfix, amavisd-new,
amavisd-milter and spamassassin. I use the versions from the Jessie
repository. My setup does pre-queue filtering, so Spamassassin does the
checks while the mail is not finally queued. Postfix calls Amavis
through t
