d you solve the
> problem?
>
> Matthew
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 January 2007 19:41
> To: Dhaval Patel
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: spamc using different perl
>
> Dha
"Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Dhaval Patel wrote:
> > I am running a Debian stable system and have perl 5.8.4 installed from the
> > Debian
packages.
> >
> > I had a problem with the Net::DNS module a while back and upgrade
I am running a Debian stable system and have perl 5.8.4 installed from the
Debian packages.
I had a problem with the Net::DNS module a while back and upgrade perl to 5.8.8
using
CPAN. This upgrade installed perl 5.8.8 as the default perl version system wide.
Unfortunately Debconf is not part of
Sorry to respond so late.
Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 5:44:09 AM, Dhaval Patel wrote:
> > Hello all, I have been using spamassassin for quite some time and just
> > recently I
> > have seen some false positives. Looking at
Hello all, I have been using spamassassin for quite some time and just recently
I have
seen some false positives. Looking at the content analysis I see that it is the
URIBL*SURBL rules that is throwing it over the edge. What is surprising is that
in some
of the emails, the URI is not even in the
I just wanted to thank everybody for a great product and for helping me
configure spamassassin. My users
and I are seeing that 99% of the spam is being caught and no ham is being
flagged as spam. This is great
news.
Thank you again.
Dhaval
a" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Dhaval Patel wrote:
> > Please bare with me while I try to get spamassassin fully tweaked.
> >
> > I received a spam in my inbox which clearly came from an ip that is on
> > blacklists
> > (http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.
"John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Dhaval Patel wrote:
>
> > debug: received-header: parsed as [ ip=125.22.64.110 rdns=
> > helo=v3uviqi8.i2uvfox.aol.com
> > by=jwblack.patel.sh ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=5EA056E02B a
Thanks for the tip. Tried it but still the same, please see the output below.
Thanks,
Dhaval
"John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Dhaval Patel wrote:
>
> > debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
> > debug: Net::DNS version
Please bare with me while I try to get spamassassin fully tweaked.
I received a spam in my inbox which clearly came from an ip that is on
blacklists
(http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=125.22.64.110) that spamassassin
should be
searching. Unfortunately spamassassin did not perform these s
"Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Dhaval Patel wrote:
> > I hope that I am asking for this kind of help in the right place.
> >
> > I always look into why any spam got into my Inbox and found the reasons for
> > this
> > mes
ter that it detects the
messages
properly as spam.
Thanks,
Dhaval
Dhaval Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have "skip_rbl_checks0 " and the following rules in the local.cf file
>
> RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 2.0
> RCVD_IN_XBL 1.0
> RCVD_IN_SBL 1.0
>
> I se
I have "skip_rbl_checks0 " and the following rules in the local.cf file
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 2.0
RCVD_IN_XBL 1.0
RCVD_IN_SBL 1.0
I see spam in my Inbox with the following in the hearders
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50,
>From the looks fo it, it does not
I installed spamassassin last night and I see emails in the spam folder. Since
I have
report_safe set to 1, it has a message in the body of the email stating that
the message
was caught by the spam filter and more details on the scores.
Now what happens when I do sa-learn on this message? Will i
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:00:31PM -0000, Dhaval Patel wrote:
> > Is there any info on how to enable/disable/write my own rules?
>
> Yes. Enabling is simple, just have the rule in place. Disabling is simple,
> just set the
> > 3. I did not clear explaination on how exactly the rbl_checks work. Can I
> > specify
> >which rbl to use and not use? I also could not find any information on which
> >connections to allow on the firewall to allow these checks. Our server is
> >not allowed
> >to make any outgoing connecti
> SpamAssassin comes with a whole bunch of rules by default.
> The best thing is to look at those rules and see what they're
> doing. There's probably real documentation somewhere, but
> there is so much example code that you may not need it.
I did not see much in the local.cf after a fresh inst
I am looking to install and configure spamassassin on my debian sarge server
with about
15 users. We have been getting lots of spam lately and spambayes is not cutting
it. We
need to use the rbl_check feature with spambayes to reduce the spams getting to
our inbox.
I have a few questions:
1. F
18 matches
Mail list logo
