On 6/7/07, Nigel Frankcom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:11:11 -0400, D.J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello all!
>
>I've tried and tried, and can't get a rule I've handwritten to work.
>Hopefully you all can help. I've got a user using Alltel's picture
>messaging that keeps g
Hello all!
I've tried and tried, and can't get a rule I've handwritten to work.
Hopefully you all can help. I've got a user using Alltel's picture
messaging that keeps getting whacked every time he sends a message.
It consistently scores about a 12.3 with my setup, where a 10 will get
you dumped
On 11/10/06, Patrick Sneyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I get this warning:plugin: failed to create instance of pluginMail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayChecker: Can't locate object method"new" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayChecker" at (eval
26) line 1.(This is my own build of SA 3.1.
Blocking mail base soley on the IP address (whether because it is a dynamic address or has at some time in the past sent a mail to a spamtrap) is akin to shooting the postman because yesterday you received an advertisement.
You obviously don't handle a lot of mail volume. If I had to scan every SM
Hi all. So I've got a DNSBL I want to use with SpamAssassin that
wasn't included in the stock install. My question (and there's an
alarming lack of anything useful in this area... wiki anyone on the SA
site?) is if my syntax and placement are correct for what I've done.
In my local.cf file, I've
> Slightly off topic here, but I have a dumb question. If you get a> message with obvious bayes poison, what *should* you do? Do you remove
> the poison and classify, or do you just not classify that message?I train it just like you would any other message - especially since manyget autolearned.
>I think what the original poster was asking was how to make the>gibberish bodies not get Bayes scanned, so as to not pollute the
>database with text that isn't spammy.Exactly my point.Slightly off topic here, but I have a dumb question. If you get a message with obvious bayes poison, what *should
Why go to all the trouble of rewriting/editing rules when it'd be a loteasier to maintain by just delegating the appropriate zones to your own
DNSBL server?DarylLOL!!! You know, sometimes you can't see the forest for the trees. This is exactly what I'm trying to pull off, and it's a heck of a lot
> Excellent! This has worked flawlessly. Now for part 2 of this> project, sort of related to the first part. So now I have only the
> zones I want to query. When I wish to move to my local servers, is> it as simple as adding a new "header" line into my local.cf file for> each list, or will I ne
On 9/8/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
D.J. wrote:> Greetings all:>> I intend to eventually have local copies for the lists I wish to use,> so it's important for me to figure this out. Currently, I'm just> trying to get SA to only do checks against the lists that I want to
> eventually
Greetings all:I intend to eventually have local copies for the lists I wish to use, so it's important for me to figure this out. Currently, I'm just trying to get SA to only do checks against the lists that I want to eventually check. However, it still appearst to be checking all of them. I've b
OK, after Googling around for a bit, I may have stumbled on something... specifically this trust path thing. I had my trusted_networks and internal_networks set as my SMTP's and MX's class C network. Because of that, is that causing SA to look at the relay beyond the trusted network as the agent
On 8/23/06,
Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a quick guess, you probably need to fix your Trust Path:http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
No, I've got that set properly, as I didn't trust the autodiscovery. So I've already entered the class C for my MX's and SMTP's there for
On 8/24/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
D.J. wrote:> On 8/24/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > D.J. wrote:> > > On 8/24/06, Bart Schaefer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > > On 8/24/06, D. J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
On 8/24/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
D.J. wrote:> On 8/24/06, Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > On 8/24/06, D. J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> > >> > > I'm expecting these type of strings for sure:> > >> >
On 8/24/06, Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/24/06, D. J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> I'm expecting these type of strings for sure:>> cat> dog> cat dog> dog cat
>> But I may get something like this too:>> cat cat dog> dog dog>
I'm not quite clear on what you want here. Your example should NOThave matched on "cat dog bird" since it contains one of your terms.
It would have matched on "bird", since it doesn't.Oops... that's what I meant. It doesn't match (though I want it to) because it contains one of the terms.
On 8/24/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
D.J. wrote:> OK, I'm stumped. I need to create a regex that will match if> anything other than two terms I've specified exist.>> So for example, I have two terms I like, say "cat" and "dog". I want
> the rule to match if a string contains anythi
On 8/24/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
D.J. wrote:> OK, I'm stumped. I need to create a regex that will match if> anything other than two terms I've specified exist.>> So for example, I have two terms I like, say "cat" and "dog". I want
> the rule to match if a string contains anythi
OK, I'm stumped. I need to create a regex that will match if anything other than two terms I've specified exist.So for example, I have two terms I like, say "cat" and "dog". I want the rule to match if a string contains anything other than cat or dog.
I tried ...$value !~ /cat|dog/ ...but this ha
On 8/24/06, D. J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
D.J. wrote:> Hello all.>> I searched my archive of the list, and couldn't find a similar issue.
> This is probably something I've misconfigured, but here goes. Running> SA 3.14 via the Mail::SpamAssassin Perl plugi
Hello all.I searched my archive of the list, and couldn't find a similar issue. This is probably something I've misconfigured, but here goes. Running SA 3.14 via the Mail::SpamAssassin Perl plugin from amavisd-new. Have been running into a problem where some dynamic RBL lists are firing just bec
22 matches
Mail list logo
