Felix,
Thank you for information.
guenther,
Yes, you are right, but this is not a reason for not working plug-ins and
options.
These options seems convenient and they are described in documentation, but
did not work in 3.2.3 and do not work up to now.
--
View this message in context:
http://ww
Hello,
I am using version 3.2.5 and, to reduce spam and SA footprint, turned on
shortcircuit plug-in.
I use standard 60_shortcircuit.cf.
At the first time, I enabled only whitelist/blacklist rules and this works
great.
Now, due to increasing amount of spam, I decided to turn on bayes
shortcircuit
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
> Sure, some messages will bail out faster, but most messages will take
> much longer to scan. How is that better?
>
> I don't debate that the basic idea of having SA do this "automagically"
> would be a great thing. However, the reality of doing it efficiently is
> much
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
>> 1. Using this method, admin must understand that the fate of every
>> message
>> (for all users) will depend from the single rule.
> Not if you set it up properly.. You can have multiple rules run with a
> very early priority (low number), then have another one run wi
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
> SA 3.2.x already does this, you just need to know how. Read the docs on
> the shortcircuit plugin, and the "priority" option for rules:
>
> Shortcircuit allows you to define when to "bail out"
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_Sho
> The most effective way I've found to lower the SA footprint is to limit
> the mail that gets to it by using some triage on the MTA side. SA as a
> standalone tool might benefit from some kind of triage functionality to
> kill messages immediately as per a "blacklist" rule. The blacklist
> ru
ad a designated file before it reads others).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Crocomoth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 9:42 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Suggestion to developers
>
>
> SpamAssassin is a really grea
SpamAssassin is a really great product.
But, it is perl-based and checks every message with a lot of (all) rules (,
always!).
Volume of spam is constantly increasing, as well as CPU and memory load that
SA creates on servers.
As a SA user, I would be happy to have the following possibility in the
